Your message dated Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:15:21 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#283734: lm-sensors: no sensors found in spite of correct
modules being loaded
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Nov 2004 23:28:00 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 30 15:28:00 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from marla.spinning-plates.eu.org [80.65.227.71] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CZHPb-0000yM-00; Tue, 30 Nov 2004 15:28:00 -0800
Received: from elea.spinning-plates.eu.org (elea.spinning-plates.eu.org
[10.0.0.13])
by marla.spinning-plates.eu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAA0F861;
Wed, 1 Dec 2004 00:27:58 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Romain Riviere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: lm-sensors: no sensors found in spite of correct modules being loaded
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 00:27:57 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: lm-sensors
Version: 2.8.8-7
Severity: important
lm-sensors installs just fine. sensors-detect ... detects my hardware
just fine. However, after loading the modules, sensors whines : "No
sensors found !"
I reproduced this on two systems running Sarge 3.1.
System A has nforce2 based motherboard with :
* ISA bus address 0x0290 (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `ITE 8712F Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
System B has Via (AppolloPro133x) based motherboad with :
* ISA bus, undetermined address (Busdriver `i2c-isa')
Chip `VIA Technologies VT82C686 Integrated Sensors' (confidence: 9)
On both machines, I've loaded i2c-core, i2c-dev, i2c-isa and i2c-sensor.
Getting the source and compiling the userspace tools did not help (same
result).
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-k7
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages lm-sensors depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30.10 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-18 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libsensors3 2.8.8-7 Library to read temperature/voltag
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
ii perl 5.8.4-3 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii sed 4.1.2-1 The GNU sed stream editor
ii sysvinit 2.86-5 System-V like init
ii ucf 1.13 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- debconf information:
lm-sensors/negatives:
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 283734-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Jan 2005 07:15:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 12 23:15:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CozCX-00065y-00; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 23:15:25 -0800
Received: from bode.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:6439:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f])
by farad.aurel32.net with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16)
(Exim 4.34)
id 1CozCU-0000Gn-RP; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:15:22 +0100
Received: from aurel32 by bode.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CozCU-0001Rb-9i; Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:15:22 +0100
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2005 08:15:21 +0100
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Romain Riviere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#283734: lm-sensors: no sensors found in spite of correct
modules being loaded
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.6+20040907i (CVS)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jan 12, 2005 at 10:15:42PM +0100, Romain Riviere wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, 2004-12-06 at 21:55 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Hi !
> >
> > You're right the problem appears where all the XX started. These chip is
> > using a 7 bit adress and thus ignore the MSB. That's mean the two half
> > should be identical. It's seems the chip get missed at that point.
> >
> > Here is the end of the chat with the upstream maintainer:
> [snip]
> > <Khali> so I'd like him to ONLY load i2c-isa+it87
> > <Khali> and see how it goes
> [snip]
>
> Well, it goes fairly well so far, ie. I get readings : they need
> computing, but they're usable.
That's nice it is working. However the problem is a bit different than
the problem that you get with your other mainboard. Here loading both
bus driver and sensors driver is forbidden by the hardware, whereas it
was forbidden by the software (ie the kernel) on the other mainboard.
> > <Khali> aurel32 : the conclusion we are likely to reach is that
> > something is NOT correct in the Shuttle's wiring
> > <Khali> voltage level or frequency or... I don't know what
> > <Khali> and there's nothing we can do about this :(
> > <Khali> aurel32 : that would certainly be worth reporting to them; even
> > if they don't answer or provide any help this may invite them to take a
> > look
>
> Shall I leave this to you or ... ?
Ok, I'll send them a mail, maybe during the week-end because it is not
sure I'll have a lot of time until then.
I think this bug can now be closed.
Bye,
Aurelien
--
.''`. Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
: :' : Debian GNU/Linux developer | Electrical Engineer
`. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
`- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
