Your message dated Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:17:14 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#261271: fixed in foomatic-filters-ppds 20050118-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jul 2004 19:53:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 24 12:53:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from emailhub.stusta.mhn.de (mailout.stusta.mhn.de) [141.84.69.5]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BoSac-0008BO-00; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 12:53:50 -0700
Received: (qmail 30240 invoked from network); 24 Jul 2004 19:53:48 -0000
Received: from r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de (10.150.63.144)
by mailhub.stusta.mhn.de with SMTP; 24 Jul 2004 19:53:48 -0000
Received: from bunk by r063144.stusta.swh.mhn.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1BoSa5-0006gk-9l; Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:53:17 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: foomatic-filters-ppds: two names for Lexmark,
leading to confusion in the Web selection
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63
Date: Sat, 24 Jul 2004 21:53:17 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: foomatic-filters-ppds
Version: 20040506-1
Severity: normal
Some ppds say
*Manufacturer: "Lexmark International"
instead of
*Manufacturer: "Lexmark"
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 261271-close) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2005 05:24:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 19 21:24:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrUoB-0003oL-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 21:24:39 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CrUh0-0001WZ-00; Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:17:14 -0500
From: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#261271: fixed in foomatic-filters-ppds 20050118-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:17:14 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: foomatic-filters-ppds
Source-Version: 20050118-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
foomatic-filters-ppds, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
cupsomatic-ppd_20050118-1_all.deb
to pool/main/f/foomatic-filters-ppds/cupsomatic-ppd_20050118-1_all.deb
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/f/foomatic-filters-ppds/foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.diff.gz
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.dsc
to pool/main/f/foomatic-filters-ppds/foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.dsc
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1_all.deb
to pool/main/f/foomatic-filters-ppds/foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1_all.deb
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118.orig.tar.gz
to
pool/main/f/foomatic-filters-ppds/foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated foomatic-filters-ppds
package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 22:46:42 -0600
Source: foomatic-filters-ppds
Binary: foomatic-filters-ppds cupsomatic-ppd
Architecture: source all
Version: 20050118-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Chris Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
cupsomatic-ppd - linuxprinting.org printer support - transition package
foomatic-filters-ppds - linuxprinting.org printer support - prebuilt PPD files
Closes: 261271 270201 291046
Changes:
foomatic-filters-ppds (20050118-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Conflict with old versions of foomatic-filters-ppds. (Closes: #291046)
* Use force-reload instead of reload in postinst. (Closes: #270201)
* No PPDs use "Lexmark International" in this release.
(Closes: #261271)
Files:
92a85007299c00818510b9e7977abbcd 651 text extra
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.dsc
c7668c75507b1bfd1b7ec869ec742e92 590357 text extra
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118.orig.tar.gz
4f9d70b377e4997d27ac56b23b475175 4527 text extra
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1.diff.gz
50de6c7d3a658ecd6ac3d8bffd33b9de 1257900 text extra
foomatic-filters-ppds_20050118-1_all.deb
2cd34cd6da85d21b01dfb651572ab3a8 2768 text extra
cupsomatic-ppd_20050118-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB7zws2wQKE6PXubwRAnBWAJ9WoH/yC8lGlnF23d6P8IDAlOz4PQCeOXEU
efpd3h/DlQV7dyw+ZvUp700=
=stl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
