Your message dated Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:57:12 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line closing this ancient bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Apr 2000 15:18:48 +0000
Received: (qmail 13723 invoked from network); 19 Apr 2000 15:18:47 -0000
Received: from glacier.binc.net (205.173.176.10)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 19 Apr 2000 15:18:47 -0000
Received: from digriz.jon.net (msn-11-88.dial.binc.net [198.70.30.88])
by glacier.binc.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id KAA26800
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:18:46 -0500
Received: from jon by digriz.jon.net with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 12hwKL-0006vD-00; Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:23:41 -0500
From: Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: using redistrubute gives wrong from address
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54
X-Mailer: reportbug 0.54
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2000 10:23:41 -0500
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Package: exmh
Version: 1:2.1.1-1
Severity: normal
I'm not sure *why* this happens.
When i use normal compose, reply-to, etc... exim, my MTA, properly rewrites the
address Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to Jon Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
However, when i use redistribute, the address never gets rewritten.
Why?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.2
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux digriz 2.2.14 #2 Tue Feb 15 21:42:52 CST 2000 i686
Versions of packages exmh depends on:
ii metamail 2.7-34 An implementation of MIME.
ii nmh [mh] 1.0.2-7 A set of electronic mail handling
ii tcl8.2 [tclsh] 8.2.3-2 The Tool Command Language (TCL) v8
ii tk8.2 [wish] 8.2.3-2 The Tk toolkit for TCL and X11 v8.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 62677-done) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2005 13:57:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 25 05:57:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from heffalump.snafu.priv.at (cft.snafu.priv.at) [202.173.190.30]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CtRCR-0002vG-00; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 05:57:43 -0800
Received: from cft.snafu.priv.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id
j0PDvdkp005407
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO)
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:57:39 +1000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by cft.snafu.priv.at (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) id j0PDvdck005405
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:57:39 +1000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: closing this ancient bug
From: Alexander Zangerl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 23:57:12 +1000
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: kuvert 1.1.8
content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----------=_1106661458-15954-3";
micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
It has been signed conforming to RFC3156.
You need GPG or PGP to check the signature.
------------=_1106661458-15954-3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
there's no way to reproduce this 5 year old minor problem with today's
versions of exmh and nmh; i'm therefore closing this bug report.
regards
az
--
+ Alexander Zangerl + DSA 42BD645D + (RSA 5B586291)
You are in a twisty maze of lusers all alike. -- Paul Martin
While, on the surface, this appears to be true. In actual fact, when examined
closely, each and every luser is uniquely and serially stupid. -- Geoff Lane
------------=_1106661458-15954-3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFB9lBTpy/2bEK9ZF0RAvLaAJ0U6bzTJ1hLAuPb/q47RPAD34WiVwCfapsQ
ICIMTitgTFu28tcvYVwbaHQ=
=PClX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
------------=_1106661458-15954-3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
