Your message dated Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:44:50 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: apt-secure broke?]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jan 2005 21:36:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jan 28 13:36:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from john.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de [134.109.132.2]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CudnC-0007R5-00; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:36:39 -0800
Received: from hedwig.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.132.173]
helo=mailbox.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de)
by john.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.41)
id 1CudnB-0006cn-9E
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:36:37 +0100
Received: from maximus.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.192.246] ident=mail)
by mailbox.hrz.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1CudnB-0004Jz-7t
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:36:37 +0100
Received: from stilzchen.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de ([134.109.192.209]
ident=mail)
by maximus.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CudnA-00057E-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:36:36 +0100
Received: from mpa by stilzchen.informatik.tu-chemnitz.de with local (Exim 3.35
#1 (Debian))
id 1CudnA-0005Gp-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:36:36 +0100
Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 22:36:36 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Release.gpg empty
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: Mirko Parthey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Scan-Signature: 8e6f1e4ce138294a44c0e5f7c63fff85
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: ftp.debian.org
Some releases of Debian currently have an empty Release.gpg file.
This makes it impossible to check the integrity of the archive
and therefore prevents debmirror from doing its job if it has this
check enabled.
I looked at the following 3 mirrors to make sure the empty Release.gpg
is in the original archive and not just on a single broken mirror:
http://ftp.de.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/Release.gpg
http://ftp.uk.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/Release.gpg
http://ftp.ca.debian.org/debian/dists/sarge/Release.gpg
At least sarge, sid and experimental seem to be affected, maybe others
too. Woody seems to be OK.
I would be glad if you could look into the Release signing.
Thanks,
Mirko
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 292704-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jan 2005 15:44:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 31 07:44:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a-eskwadraat.nl [131.211.34.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CvdjP-0001Aq-00; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 07:44:51 -0800
Received: from jeroen by A-Eskwadraat.nl with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CvdjO-00081Q-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:44:50 +0100
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:44:50 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Re: apt-secure broke?]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
A new key was recently made, and will be on the mirrors after tonight's
mirror pulse.
--Jeroen
----- Forwarded message from Anthony Towns <[email protected]> -----
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 16:05:18 +1000
From: Anthony Towns <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: apt-secure broke?
Resent-From: [email protected]
Steve Kowalik wrote:
>On Sun, 30 Jan 2005 06:21:26 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis uttered
>>I suspect this has to do with
>>http://http.us.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/Release.gpg being an
>>empty file. Stable still has a signature; what happaned?
>If I remember the conversation on IRC correctly, the archive GPG key
>expired ...
Thus marking almost four years since we've had support for this on the
server, and still no support for it on the client, even in unstable. *sigh*
Anyway, should be fixed as of tomorrow. New key at
http://ftp-master.debian.org/ziyi_key_2005.asc
Cheers,
aj
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- End forwarded message -----
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
