Your message dated Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line No follow ups and xfce removed now.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Jan 2005 07:57:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 11 23:57:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from c129195.adsl.hansenet.de (localhost.localdomain)
[213.39.129.195]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CodNg-0004le-00; Tue, 11 Jan 2005 23:57:28 -0800
Received: from aj by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CodTg-00073T-7z; Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:03:40 +0100
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfce: FTBFS (amd64/gcc-4.0): static declaration of '_XA_WIN_STATE'
follows non-static declaration
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 09:03:40 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xfce
Severity: normal
When building 'xfce' on amd64 with gcc-4.0,
I get the following error:
In file included from xfgnome.c:43:
xfgnome.h:143: error: static declaration of '_XA_WIN_STATE' follows non-static
declaration
../xfwm/xfwm.h:358: error: previous declaration of '_XA_WIN_STATE' was here
xfgnome.h:148: error: static declaration of '_XA_WIN_WORKSPACE' follows
non-static declaration
../xfwm/xfwm.h:356: error: previous declaration of '_XA_WIN_WORKSPACE' was here
xfgnome.h:149: error: static declaration of '_XA_WIN_WORKSPACE_COUNT' follows
non-static declaration
../xfwm/xfwm.h:355: error: previous declaration of '_XA_WIN_WORKSPACE_COUNT'
was here
make[3]: *** [xfgnome.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/xfce-3.8.18/xfgnome'
With the attached patch 'xfce' can be compiled
on amd64 using gcc-4.0.
I am not sure if this patch is correct, though.
Regards
Andreas Jochens
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xfce-3.8.18/xfgnome/xfgnome.c ./xfgnome/xfgnome.c
--- ../tmp-orig/xfce-3.8.18/xfgnome/xfgnome.c 2001-08-10 15:11:08.000000000
+0200
+++ ./xfgnome/xfgnome.c 2005-01-12 08:37:48.798368688 +0100
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
#include "utils.h"
#include "module.h"
-#include "../xfwm/xfwm.h"
#include "xfgnome.h"
+#include "../xfwm/xfwm.h"
#include "constant.h"
#ifdef DMALLOC
diff -urN ../tmp-orig/xfce-3.8.18/xfsamba/xfsamba.h ./xfsamba/xfsamba.h
--- ../tmp-orig/xfce-3.8.18/xfsamba/xfsamba.h 2002-11-10 14:27:33.000000000
+0100
+++ ./xfsamba/xfsamba.h 2005-01-12 08:40:47.321229088 +0100
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
EXTERN selected_struc selected;
EXTERN nmb_list *thisN, *headN;
-EXTERN nmb_history *thisH, *headH;
+EXTERN nmb_history *thisH;
EXTERN void *fork_obj;
EXTERN int SMBResult;
EXTERN int SMBabortdrop;
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 289986-done) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Feb 2005 18:18:01 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 22 10:18:01 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from the.earth.li [193.201.200.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D3ebg-0000F1-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:18:01 -0800
Received: from huggie by the.earth.li with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1D3ebg-0002YZ-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:00 +0000
From: Simon Huggins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: No follow ups and xfce removed now.
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: Black Cat Networks, http://www.blackcatnetworks.co.uk/
X-Attribution: huggie
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,SORTED_RECIPS
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 17
xfce has been removed from the archive (note we recommend you use xfce4)
and either this bug is now irrelevant, there have been no follow ups to
a reasonable request from the maintainer on this bug for a long time or
I've not seen this bug in xfce4 so I'm closing it.
If you want further justification feel free to discuss it with me.
If you can reproduce them in xfce4 please reopen and reassign to xfce4
(or better the component you think is buggy) or start a new bug.
Thanks,
Simon.
--
oOoOo "And 1.1.81 is officially BugFree(tm), so if you receive oOoOo
oOoOo any bug-reports on it, you know they are just evil lies." oOoOo
oOoOo - Linus Torvalds oOoOo
htag.pl 0.0.22 ::::::: http://www.earth.li/~huggie/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
