Your message dated Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:00:28 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#296773: rp_pppoe: fails with renamed interfaces
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 15:36:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 07:36:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from armagnac.ifi.unizh.ch (albatross.madduck.net) [130.60.75.72]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4L24-0006Lp-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 07:36:04 -0800
Received: from localhost (albatross.madduck.net [127.0.0.1])
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id 8C8628C0BC8
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:36:02 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wing.madduck.net (15.3.98-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.98.3.15])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "wing.madduck.net", Issuer "madduck.net CA" (verified OK))
by albatross.madduck.net (postfix) with ESMTP id DDAE58C0BB5
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:36:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wing.madduck.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 899F5602E88; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:37:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:37:56 +0100
From: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: rp_pppoe: fails with renamed interfaces
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
X-OS: Debian GNU/Linux 3.1 kernel 2.6.10-wing i686
X-Motto: Keep the good times rollin'
X-Subliminal-Message: debian/rules!
X-Debbugs-No-Ack: please spare me
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by albatross.madduck.net
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_NO_ACK autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: ppp
Version: 2.4.2+20040428-6
Severity: minor
In rp_pppoe/plugin.c:328/PPPoEDevnameHook, the plugin hardcodes
prefixes of acceptable interface names. If I use ifrename/udev to
rename the interface to something sensible, I cannot use rp-pppoe
anymore.
The source code speaks of a "fix". I am not sure what kind of fix
this is, nor whether it's actually required.
Please allow the use of arbitrary interface names.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (600, 'testing'), (98, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10-wing
Locale: LANG=3Den_GB, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
Versions of packages ppp depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libpam-modules 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modul=
es f
ii libpam-runtime 0.76-22 Runtime support for the PAM li=
brar
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modul=
es l
ii libpcap0.7 0.7.2-7 System interface for user-leve=
l pa
ii libssl0.9.7 0.9.7e-3 SSL shared libraries
ii makedev 2.3.1-75 Creates device files in /dev
ii netbase 4.20 Basic TCP/IP networking system
ii procps 1:3.2.4-1 The /proc file system utilities
-- no debconf information
--=20
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: :' : proud Debian developer, admin, user, and author
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
=20
Invalid/expired PGP subkeys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCHfTUIgvIgzMMSnURAlrJAJ9vjPNL8gXs7Lh5gYl7qTWlRn4UMACfZ915
H4AOn33OO66xtkRLJuI/HYM=
=PN/a
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 296773-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2005 17:15:15 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 24 09:15:15 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from attila.bofh.it [213.92.8.2] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D4Ma3-0005h5-00; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:15:15 -0800
Received: by attila.bofh.it (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 29D215F856; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:15:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by wonderland.linux.it (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 468761C152; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:00:28 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:00:28 +0100
To: martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#296773: rp_pppoe: fails with renamed interfaces
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marco d'Itri)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Feb 24, martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In rp_pppoe/plugin.c:328/PPPoEDevnameHook, the plugin hardcodes
> prefixes of acceptable interface names. If I use ifrename/udev to
> rename the interface to something sensible, I cannot use rp-pppoe
> anymore.
Currently you may specify other interfaces as nas-$REALNAME, I will
consider making any name acceptable in a future release.
--=20
ciao,
Marco
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCHggsFGfw2OHuP7ERAnY4AJ0dj+ynxjN9SXvOVRyF5YORc+KAAwCeIv6a
ftPfv9/gJT+qcBITZHJHTOo=
=70Pl
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--tThc/1wpZn/ma/RB--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
