Your message dated Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:27 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#295397: fixed in xfsprogs 2.6.26-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Feb 2005 15:37:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Feb 15 07:37:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from uiver.cs.vu.nl (Knoppix) [130.37.30.110]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1D14lF-0005D5-00; Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:37:13 -0800
Received: by Knoppix
via sendmail from stdin
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:42:22 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1904756397=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Frits Daalmans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xfsprogs: xfs_check manual page incorrect
Bcc:
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.64
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:42:21 +0100
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1904756397==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: xfsprogs
Version: 2.6.20-1
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
Hello,
I used xfs_check to verify an xfs filesystem.
it returned without any output, and the filesystem tests OK.
(so far so good :-))
However, the manual page says, at the end of the DESCRIPTION chapter,
and just before DIAGNOSTICS, that:
"Any NON-VERBOSE output from xfs_check means that the filesystem has an
inconsistency"
I think that it should instead say
"Any VERBOSE output from xfs_check means that the filesystem has an
inconsistency"
Is that correct?
If not, I apologise for wasting your time.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xfsprogs depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline4 4.3-11 GNU readline and history libraries
ii libuuid1 1.35-6 Universally unique id library
-- no debconf information
--===============1904756397==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="mypatch"
diff -Naur OLD/usr/share/man/man8/xfs_check.8 NEW/usr/share/man/man8/xfs_check.8
--- OLD/usr/share/man/man8/xfs_check.8 2004-07-28 22:51:52.000000000 +0200
+++ NEW/usr/share/man/man8/xfs_check.8 2005-02-15 16:24:37.000000000 +0100
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@
.B convert
command.
.PP
-Any non-verbose output from
+Any verbose output from
.I xfs_check
means that the filesystem has an inconsistency.
The filesystem can be repaired using either
--===============1904756397==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 295397-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Mar 2005 00:57:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 20 16:57:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDBEt-00032r-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 16:57:51 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDB4p-0007Yw-00; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:27 -0500
From: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#295397: fixed in xfsprogs 2.6.26-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 19:47:27 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Source: xfsprogs
Source-Version: 2.6.26-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
xfsprogs, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
xfslibs-dev_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfslibs-dev_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
xfsprogs-udeb_2.6.26-1_i386.udeb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs-udeb_2.6.26-1_i386.udeb
xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.dsc
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.dsc
xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.tar.gz
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.tar.gz
xfsprogs_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
to pool/main/x/xfsprogs/xfsprogs_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated xfsprogs package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 16:56:35 +1100
Source: xfsprogs
Binary: xfsprogs-udeb xfslibs-dev xfsprogs
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.6.26-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Nathan Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
xfslibs-dev - XFS filesystem-specific static libraries and headers
xfsprogs - Utilities for managing the XFS filesystem
xfsprogs-udeb - A stripped-down version of xfsprogs, for debian-installer
(udeb)
Closes: 295397 297876
Changes:
xfsprogs (2.6.26-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Man page updates (closes: #295397)
* Fix compilation with gcc version 4 (closes: #297876)
* Switch build dependency from readline4 to readline5.
Files:
b2d3e688e9690731fb2eb5aa1fecd7a1 573 admin optional xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.dsc
fadf2bc4e532992719a73cc07479faca 834084 admin optional xfsprogs_2.6.26-1.tar.gz
a9b45d52f5c9fa3b31f2fcdbda96860d 888230 admin optional
xfsprogs_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
2c62c9c0883a6f1ceebb164b053b5ff2 253576 libdevel extra
xfslibs-dev_2.6.26-1_i386.deb
d18677ee5c544e2b86c473c933509cec 123908 debian-installer optional
xfsprogs-udeb_2.6.26-1_i386.udeb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCPhSlm8fl3HSIa2MRAtPkAJwLnsY9JK1aOFEf3A0y1tuKN9xGjACgl65+
+PxEpgOugzNbxC4p+sjDJOU=
=Nr5R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
