Your message dated Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:52:22 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#303580: hmake: Thinks it can't build 64-bit bins when it
should build 32-bit bins
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 15:24:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 07 08:24:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gatekeeper.excelhustler.com
(gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com) [68.99.114.105]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJYs3-0006ab-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 08:24:39 -0700
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (unknown
[192.168.0.12])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(Client CN "chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com", Issuer
"excelhustler.com" (not verified))
by gatekeeper.elmer.external.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 78028F81F9; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:24:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5015E211C2; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:24:08 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com ([192.168.0.12])
by localhost (chatterbox [192.168.0.12]) (amavisd-new, port 10025)
with ESMTP id 08133-01; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:24:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from wile.internal.excelhustler.com (wile.internal.excelhustler.com
[192.168.1.34])
by chatterbox.elmer.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 01725F81F9; Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:24:06 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by wile.internal.excelhustler.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A0F9DF002; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:22:59 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: hmake: Thinks it can't build 64-bit bins when it should build 32-bit
bins
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.4
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:22:59 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at excelhustler.com
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_96_XX,
HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: hmake
Version: 3.08-7
Severity: normal
It is possible to run a 32-bit userland under a 64-bit amd64 kernel.
This 32-bit userland is indistinguishable from a standard 32-bit x86
userland, with the exception of the uname -a return value and some files
ni proc. I routinely use ghc in this 32-bit userland and it works fine.
hmake, however, does not:
hmake -IHaXml-1.12/src -nhc98 -o dtmconv.static dtmconv.hs
hmake is not installed/configured for x86_64-Linux.
See your system administrator, or install it yourself from
http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/fp/hmake/
This is a silly check. It should not be occuring at runtime.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages hmake depends on:
ii ghc5 5.04.3-9 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilat
ii ghc6 6.2.2-2 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilat
ii haskell-utils 1.6 Utilities used by the Debian Haske
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-19 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgmp3 4.1.4-5 Multiprecision arithmetic library
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libreadline4 4.3-15 GNU readline and history libraries
ii nhc98 1.16-14 aNother Haskell Compiler (the nhc9
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 303580-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Apr 2005 20:53:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 07 13:53:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from i-194-106-34-144.freedom2surf.net (matrix.chaos.earth.li)
[194.106.34.144]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DJe08-0000nO-00; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 13:53:20 -0700
Received: from ian by matrix.chaos.earth.li with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DJdzC-0001mk-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 07 Apr 2005 21:52:22 +0100
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 21:52:22 +0100
From: Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#303580: hmake: Thinks it can't build 64-bit bins when it
should build 32-bit bins
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
Sender: Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2005 at 08:22:59AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote:
> Package: hmake
> Version: 3.08-7
This should already be fixed in 3.09-3.
> It is possible to run a 32-bit userland under a 64-bit amd64 kernel.
> This 32-bit userland is indistinguishable from a standard 32-bit x86
> userland, with the exception of the uname -a return value and some files
> ni proc. I routinely use ghc in this 32-bit userland and it works fine.
That said, if you want to use i386 debs on an amd64 you should really be
running them under the linux32 program anyway.
Thanks
Ian
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
