Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 23:15:43 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#302315: sparc: depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 instead
of libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 08:53:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 00:53:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.140.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DGvQt-0003qb-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 00:53:43 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1])
by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81E7A2BC41
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:53:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (honk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 09505-23 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bogon.sigxcpu.org (unknown [62.157.100.134])
(using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46E72BC3E
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:53:38 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by bogon.sigxcpu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C166744ED; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:38:58 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 10:38:58 +0200
From: Guido Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: sparc: depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 instead of
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.9
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.8i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: python-apt
Version: 0.6.10
Severity: normal
Tags: experimental
Hi,
on sparc python-apt depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 instead of
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.5 as it should. With this dependency it isn't
installable with apt 0.6.25 as it should.
Can I binary NMU?
-- Guido
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCS7cin88szT8+ZCYRAnk8AKCA95iUODLLTte0b4lNICTHlTfGNwCeNdRP
qcqYiFmHtwh9mYeTqN7FdKw=
=t1pR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302315-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 21:15:52 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 14:15:52 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DVyYZ-00077d-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:15:52 -0700
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 May 2005 21:15:20 -0000
Received: from unknown (EHLO orest.greek0.net) [81.189.246.175]
by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 11 May 2005 23:15:20 +0200
X-Authenticated: #815883
Received: from greek0 by orest.greek0.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DVyYS-00054Q-2B
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 11 May 2005 23:15:44 +0200
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 23:15:43 +0200
From: Christian Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#302315: sparc: depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 instead of
libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Christian Aichinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 04:56:23PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 10:38:58AM +0200, Guido Guenther wrote:
>=20
> > Package: python-apt
> > Version: 0.6.10
> > Severity: normal
> > Tags: experimental
> >=20
> > Hi,
> > on sparc python-apt depends on libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.3 instead of
> > libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3.5 as it should. With this dependency it isn't
> > installable with apt 0.6.25 as it should.
> > Can I binary NMU?
This has solved itself with the new upload of python-apt.
Thanks for your bugreport.
Cheers,
Christian 'Greek0' Aichinger
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCgnX/xsP1RlTwJHsRAhvYAJ99UTgRt4qQOUqPlXMi96RS6S6RFACdGkXi
F/D2PkuG5spQo7scTjf7nZ0=
=bddL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
