Your message dated Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#308672: azureus: compiled with incompatible bytecode?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 20:34:14 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 13:34:14 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtpout16.mailhost.ntl.com (mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com) 
[212.250.162.16] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DVxuH-0007MH-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 13:34:13 -0700
Received: from aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com ([212.250.162.8])
          by mta08-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 May 2005 21:33:42 +0100
Received: from ice.sentient ([81.101.53.72])
          by aamta02-winn.mailhost.ntl.com with ESMTP
          id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
          for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 May 2005 21:33:41 +0100
Received: from jel by ice.sentient with local (Exim 4.50)
        id 1DVxt3-0007lv-8H; Wed, 11 May 2005 21:32:57 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: azureus: compiled with incompatible bytecode?
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:32:56 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: azureus
Version: 2.3.0.0-1
Severity: important

azureus depends on "sun-j2sdk1.5 | java2-runtime", but on IBM's Java2 runtime, 
azureus fails with the following message:

The java class could not be loaded. java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: 
org/gudy/azureus2/ui/swt/Main (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)

The IBM Java2 JDK is packaged and installed by the debian "java-package" 
program, and claims to support java2-runtime:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show ibm-j2sdk1.4
Package: ibm-j2sdk1.4
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: non-free/devel
Installed-Size: 83884
Maintainer: Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Architecture: powerpc
Version: 1.4.2
Replaces: ibm-j2sdk1.4debian
Provides: java-common, java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java2-runtime, 
java-browser-plugin, java-compiler, java2-compiler, j2sdk1.4, j2re1.4
Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 | xlibs 
(>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxi6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxmu6 | 
xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxp6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxt6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), 
libxtst6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
Description: Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, IBM Corporation
 The Java(TM) 2 SDK is a development environment for building
 applications, applets, and components that can be deployed on the
 Java platform.
 .
 The Java(TM) 2 SDK software includes tools useful for developing and
 testing programs written in the Java programming language and running
 on the Java platform. These tools are designed to be used from the
 command line. Except for appletviewer, these tools do not provide a
 graphical user interface.
 .
 This package has been automatically created with java-package (0.22).


After some googling, I found a comment on slashdot that suggests the problem is 
related to sun jdk 1.5 bytecode sacrificing backwards compatibility:

http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=123810&threshold=1&commentsort=0&tid=108&mode=thread&cid=10393306

According to replies to that comment, using the option "-target 1.4" when 
generating the bytecode will fix this.  Hope it helps :)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages azureus depends on:
ii  gij-3.3 [java-virtual-machin 1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Java bytecode interpreter
ii  ibm-j2sdk1.4 [java2-runtime] 1.4.2       Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, 
ii  libcommons-cli-java          1.0-6       API for working with the command l
ii  liblog4j1.2-java             1.2.9-1     Logging library for java
ii  libswt-gtk-3.1-java          3.0+3.1M4-3 Standard Widget Toolkit for GTK Ja

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308672-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 May 2005 21:53:45 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 11 14:53:45 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DVz9F-0003PB-00; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:45 -0700
Received: by rproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i8so164323rne
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
        s=beta; d=gmail.com;
        
h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        
b=Ro/DJaNnl9mV/iaQR1rpEZWnZyW0V21j8LqctfOztBGUbLC9K7pE6KBRx7ZRQ+JbO6mcI7di+neXrtt1beHc3yuIqujMyhk71GjH6PGCJZdJRFs87A1yKwd8qPnKUNTGVO/ciPg6Ji+SBwLdSYmjstdTVK+Y9wlBCIbSgJo2Qm8=
Received: by 10.11.116.47 with SMTP id o47mr33712cwc;
        Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.11.99.60 with HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:44 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:53:44 -0700
From: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#308672: azureus: compiled with incompatible bytecode?
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Already reported in #308545: azureus: Azureus doesnt start, and
already fixed in azureus 2.3.0.0-2.

azureus (2.3.0.0-2) unstable; urgency=3Dlow

  * Target Java VM 1.4.2. Closes: #308545.

 -- Shaun Jackman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Tue, 10 May 2005 17:38:27 -0700

Cheers,
Shaun

On 5/11/05, Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Package: azureus
> Version: 2.3.0.0-1
> Severity: important
>=20
> azureus depends on "sun-j2sdk1.5 | java2-runtime", but on IBM's Java2 run=
time, azureus fails with the following message:
>=20
> The java class could not be loaded. java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionErro=
r: org/gudy/azureus2/ui/swt/Main (Unsupported major.minor version 49.0)
>=20
> The IBM Java2 JDK is packaged and installed by the debian "java-package" =
program, and claims to support java2-runtime:
>=20
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show ibm-j2sdk1.4
> Package: ibm-j2sdk1.4
> Status: install ok installed
> Priority: optional
> Section: non-free/devel
> Installed-Size: 83884
> Maintainer: Lee Braiden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Architecture: powerpc
> Version: 1.4.2
> Replaces: ibm-j2sdk1.4debian
> Provides: java-common, java-virtual-machine, java-runtime, java2-runtime,=
 java-browser-plugin, java-compiler, java2-compiler, j2sdk1.4, j2re1.4
> Depends: libc6 (>=3D 2.3.2.ds1-4), libstdc++5 (>=3D 1:3.3.4-1), libx11-6 =
| xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxext6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxi6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0),=
 libxmu6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxp6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0), libxt6 | xlibs (>> =
4.1.0), libxtst6 | xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
> Description: Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edition, IBM Corporation
>  The Java(TM) 2 SDK is a development environment for building
>  applications, applets, and components that can be deployed on the
>  Java platform.
>  .
>  The Java(TM) 2 SDK software includes tools useful for developing and
>  testing programs written in the Java programming language and running
>  on the Java platform. These tools are designed to be used from the
>  command line. Except for appletviewer, these tools do not provide a
>  graphical user interface.
>  .
>  This package has been automatically created with java-package (0.22).
>=20
> After some googling, I found a comment on slashdot that suggests the prob=
lem is related to sun jdk 1.5 bytecode sacrificing backwards compatibility:
>=20
> http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=3D123810&threshold=3D1&com=
mentsort=3D0&tid=3D108&mode=3Dthread&cid=3D10393306
>=20
> According to replies to that comment, using the option "-target 1.4" when=
 generating the bytecode will fix this.  Hope it helps :)
>=20
> -- System Information:
> Debian Release: 3.1
>   APT prefers unstable
>   APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
> Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
> Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-powerpc
> Locale: LANG=3Den_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8)
>=20
> Versions of packages azureus depends on:
> ii  gij-3.3 [java-virtual-machin 1:3.3.5-12  The GNU Java bytecode interp=
reter
> ii  ibm-j2sdk1.4 [java2-runtime] 1.4.2       Java(TM) 2 SDK, Standard Edi=
tion,
> ii  libcommons-cli-java          1.0-6       API for working with the com=
mand l
> ii  liblog4j1.2-java             1.2.9-1     Logging library for java
> ii  libswt-gtk-3.1-java          3.0+3.1M4-3 Standard Widget Toolkit for =
GTK Ja


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to