Your message dated Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:16 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#299937: fixed in dak 1.0-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2005 12:51:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 17 04:51:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from postfix4-1.free.fr [213.228.0.62]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DBuTD-0008GH-00; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 04:51:24 -0800
Received: from localhost.localdomain (lns-vlq-39f-81-56-144-162.adsl.proxad.net
[81.56.144.162])
by postfix4-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF212BA5CB
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:51:18 +0100 (CET)
Received: from lehobey by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DBuRV-0000uV-1I
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:49:37 +0100
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1820135600=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Frederic LEHOBEY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: dak: uma does not work with gnupg 1.4.0 that is in unstable
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 13:49:36 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.
--===============1820135600==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: dak
Version: 1.0-7
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
Hi,
The human readable output format has slightly changed between gnupg
1.2.5 and 1.4.0. It breaks uma. I have patched uma in order to make
it use the output of the --with-colons option of gpg which works for any
gnupg versions. I have tested the patch (but I am not a python expert).
Best regards,
Frederic Lehobey
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.27-2-sparc64
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
Versions of packages dak depends on:
ii apt [libapt-pkg-libc6.3-5-3 0.5.28.5 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii apt-utils 0.5.28.5 APT utility programs
ii bzip2 1.0.2-5 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii debconf 1.4.46 Debian configuration management sy
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.27 Package building tools for Debian
ii exim4-daemon-light [mail-tr 4.50-4 lightweight exim MTA (v4) daemon
ii gnupg 1.4.0-3 GNU privacy guard - a free PGP rep
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-11 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii python 2.3.5-1 An interactive high-level object-o
ii python-apt 0.5.10 Python interface to libapt-pkg
ii python-ldap 2.0.4-1 A LDAP interface module for Python
ii python-pygresql 1:3.6.1-1 PostgreSQL module for Python
ii ucf 1.14 Update Configuration File: preserv
-- debconf information excluded
--===============1820135600==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dak-gpg-patch.txt"
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/contrib and dak-1.0/contrib
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/debian and dak-1.0/debian
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/docs and dak-1.0/docs
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/examples and dak-1.0/examples
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/templates and dak-1.0/templates
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/test and dak-1.0/test
diff -u dak-1.0-deb/uma dak-1.0/uma
--- dak-1.0-deb/uma 2005-03-08 15:34:25.000000000 +0100
+++ dak-1.0/uma 2005-03-17 10:03:50.000000000 +0100
@@ -41,10 +41,10 @@
Katie = None;
Subst = None;
-re_gpg_fingerprint = re.compile(r"^\s+Key fingerprint = (.*)$", re.MULTILINE);
-# The next one is dirty
-re_user_address = re.compile(r"^.*<(.*)@.*>$", re.MULTILINE);
-re_user_mails = re.compile(r"^.*<([EMAIL PROTECTED])>$", re.MULTILINE);
+re_gpg_fingerprint = re.compile(r"^fpr:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:(.*):",
re.MULTILINE);
+re_user_address = re.compile(r"^uid:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*<(.*)@.*>:",
re.MULTILINE);
+re_user_name = re.compile(r"^uid:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:(.*<[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>):", re.MULTILINE);
+re_user_mails = re.compile(r"^uid:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*:.*<([EMAIL
PROTECTED])>:", re.MULTILINE);
################################################################################
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
% (Cnf["Dinstall::GPGKeyring"], Cnf["Uma::Options::Key"]);
(result, output) = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd);
- cmd = "gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-default-keyring --keyring=%s
--keyring=%s --with-fingerprint --list-key %s" \
+ cmd = "gpg --no-secmem-warning --no-default-keyring --keyring=%s
--keyring=%s --with-fingerprint --with-colons --fixed-list-mode --list-key %s" \
% (Cnf["Dinstall::PGPKeyring"], Cnf["Dinstall::GPGKeyring"],
Cnf["Uma::Options::Key"]);
(result, output) = commands.getstatusoutput(cmd);
@@ -159,7 +159,6 @@
% (Cnf["Uma::Options::Key"],
utils.prefix_multi_line_string(output, \
" [GPG output:] ")));
primary_key = m.group(1);
- primary_key = primary_key.replace(" ","");
uid = ""
if Cnf.has_key("Uma::Options::User") and Cnf["Uma::Options::User"]:
@@ -171,7 +170,7 @@
utils.fubar("0x%s: No userid found in gpg output but it returned
0?\n%s" \
% (Cnf["Uma::Options::Key"],
utils.prefix_multi_line_string(output, " [GPG output:] ")));
uid = u.group(1);
- name = " ".join(output.split('\n')[0].split()[3:]);
+ name = re_user_name.search(output).group(1);
# Look for all email addresses on the key.
emails=[];
Common subdirectories: dak-1.0-deb/wanna-build and dak-1.0/wanna-build
--===============1820135600==--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 299937-close) by bugs.debian.org; 21 May 2005 15:20:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 21 08:20:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZVmT-0002hj-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 08:20:49 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DZVj2-0005Lh-00; Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:16 -0400
From: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#299937: fixed in dak 1.0-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 11:17:16 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.1 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
REMOVE_REMOVAL_2WORD autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
Source: dak
Source-Version: 1.0-8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dak, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dak_1.0-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/dak/dak_1.0-8.diff.gz
dak_1.0-8.dsc
to pool/main/d/dak/dak_1.0-8.dsc
dak_1.0-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/dak/dak_1.0-8_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dak package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 21 May 2005 16:44:40 +0200
Source: dak
Binary: dak
Architecture: source i386
Version: 1.0-8
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dak - Debian's archive maintenance scripts
Closes: 299626 299937 299938 302482 308041
Changes:
dak (1.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "dak: uma does not work with gnupg 1.4.0 that is in
unstable" (Closes: #299937).
* Bug fix: "dak: A small typo", thanks to Frederic LEHOBEY (Closes:
#299626).
* Bug fix: "dak: add a recommendation for sudo", thanks to Frederic
LEHOBEY (Closes: #299938).
* Bug fix: "dak: [INTL:ja] Initial Japanese debconf translation", thanks
to Kenshi Muto (Closes: #302482).
* dak: French debconf templates translation
* Bug fix: "[l10n] Czech translation for dak", thanks to Martin Šín
(Closes: #308041).
* Step back to a jennifer which actually runs on Debian hosts too, thus
removing removing a small function to check debs a bit more.
Files:
b1e0649fcc2def1e42fe13d013ccc3b1 738 misc optional dak_1.0-8.dsc
95ba7a19770178df511ba949a29b97c3 34164 misc optional dak_1.0-8.diff.gz
126897fd0fdac5ef73519bfe898a8da5 249482 misc optional dak_1.0-8_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian Developer
iD8DBQFCj06UcV7WoH57iskRAm+LAKCbK5xxNUqIDxQzeaSeH6NpfJE9vgCfRsTR
vWS1KJdsVjfSjdHvSRedcTA=
=pLPc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
