Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:05:37 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line 2.0.13 in unstable closes fixed-in-experimental bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Jun 2004 11:23:40 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jun 16 04:23:40 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from eth1859.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (gryphon.hezmatt.org)
[150.101.200.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BaYW3-0000B4-00; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 04:23:40 -0700
Received: from mpalmer by gryphon.hezmatt.org with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
id 1BaYTw-0006uX-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:21:28 +1000
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2004 21:21:28 +1000
From: Matthew Palmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: executable 00template not working
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Package: dpatch
Severity: normal
Version: 2.0.8
Tags: patch
The manual page for dpatch-edit-patch says that, if
debian/patches/00template is +x, it will be run to obtain the header to
prepend to the newly created patch.
However, my experience is that it doesn't. The code doesn't bear this out,
either -- instead, it uses the undocumented DPEP_OPTION_EXEC_TEMPLATE
option.
Attached is a patch to make dpatch-edit-patch act like the documentation. I
believe this is a superior solution to an option -- it clearly expresses the
intent of the user, as +x is not set by default.
I've tested the patch and it appears to work nicely.
- Matt
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=dpatch-patch
--- dpatch-edit-patch.functions.orig 2004-06-16 21:16:35.000000000 +1000
+++ dpatch-edit-patch.functions 2004-06-16 21:17:12.000000000 +1000
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
}
dpep_template_apply() {
- if [ "$DPEP_OPTION_EXEC_TEMPLATE" = "1" ]; then
+ if [ "$DPEP_OPTION_EXEC_TEMPLATE" = "1" ] || [ -x
debian/patches/00template ]; then
chmod +x debian/patches/00template
debian/patches/00template "$(basename "$1")" "$2" > "$1"
else
--sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 254689-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 16:05:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 09:05:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 5301d.unt0.torres.l21.ma.zugschlus.de
(torres.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de) [217.151.83.1] (Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DfgaC-0000b3-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 09:05:40 -0700
Received: from mh by torres.int.l21.ma.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1Dfga9-0002nj-Jw; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 18:05:37 +0200
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 18:05:37 +0200
From: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Marc Haber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: 2.0.13 in unstable closes fixed-in-experimental bugs
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 26
Hi,
dpatch 2.0.13 is now in unstable, which closes the bugs that were
fixed in experimental for 2.0.12 and 2.0.11.
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 621 72739834
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 621 72739835
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
