Your message dated Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:01:00 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line My mistake
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 20:48:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 07 13:48:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-67-39-8-212.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net 
(santiago.familiasanchez.net) [67.39.8.212] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DUWDs-0002IV-00; Sat, 07 May 2005 13:48:28 -0700
Received: from [192.168.2.3] (miami.familiasanchez.net [192.168.2.3])
        by santiago.familiasanchez.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00E7D6009A0
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat,  7 May 2005 16:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 07 May 2005 16:48:22 -0400
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050331)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: httperf errors out when requesting SSL sessions
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.91.0.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig1293AED279893937FEC35D70"
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig1293AED279893937FEC35D70
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Package: httperf
Version: 0.8-1
Severity: important

When trying to stress test my webserver with httperf, I noticed that
requests to test SSL connections causes httperf to error out. Here
are the messages:

~$ httperf --server familiasanchez.net --port 80 --num-conns 15000
--rate 100 --timeout 1 --ssl httperf --timeout=1 --client=0/1
--server=familiasanchez.net --port=80 --uri=/ --rate=100
--send-buffer=4096 --recv-buffer=16384 --ssl --num-conns=15000 --num-calls=1
httperf: failed to connect to SSL server (err=-1, reason=1)
1316:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:286:

~$ httperf --server familiasanchez.net --port 80 --num-conns 15000
--rate 100 --timeout 1 --ssl --ssl-ciphers=EXP-RC4-MD5:EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5
httperf --timeout=1 --client=0/1 --server=familiasanchez.net --port=80
--uri=/ --rate=100 --send-buffer=4096 --recv-buffer=16384 --ssl
--ssl-ciphers=EXP-RC4-MD5:EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 --num-conns=15000 --num-calls=1
httperf: failed to connect to SSL server (err=-1, reason=1)
1317:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:286:

~$ httperf --server familiasanchez.net --port 80 --num-conns 15000
--rate 100 --timeout 1 --ssl --ssl-ciphers=EXP-RC4-MD5:EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5
--ssl-no-reuse
httperf --timeout=1 --client=0/1 --server=familiasanchez.net --port=80
--uri=/ --rate=100 --send-buffer=4096 --recv-buffer=16384 --ssl
--ssl-ciphers=EXP-RC4-MD5:EXP-RC2-CBC-MD5 --ssl-no-reuse
--num-conns=15000 --num-calls=1
httperf: failed to connect to SSL server (err=-1, reason=1)
1318:error:1408F10B:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:wrong version
number:s3_pkt.c:286:

However, it finds all of the correct shared libs:

~$ ldd /usr/bin/httperf                 libssl.so.0.9.6 =>
/usr/lib/i686/cmov/libssl.so.0.9.6 (0x40028000)
        libcrypto.so.0.9.6 => /usr/lib/i686/cmov/libcrypto.so.0.9.6
(0x40057000)        libm.so.6 => /lib/tls/libm.so.6 (0x40119000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/tls/libc.so.6 (0x4013b000)
        libdl.so.2 => /lib/tls/libdl.so.2 (0x40270000)
        /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x40000000)

-Roberto

-- 
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr

--------------enig1293AED279893937FEC35D70
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCfSmeTfhoonTOp2oRAug6AKDBWNNP5Hn17BoYrsYHkpspppv61QCdHWEc
7Zglagqj/tpS5PqqylhlVXI=
=OaI7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig1293AED279893937FEC35D70--

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 308097-close) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jun 2005 23:01:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 07 16:01:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from adsl-67-39-5-57.dsl.dytnoh.ameritech.net 
(santiago.familiasanchez.net) [67.39.5.57] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1Dfn4J-00021r-00; Tue, 07 Jun 2005 16:01:11 -0700
Received: from miami (miami.familiasanchez.net [192.168.2.3])
        by santiago.familiasanchez.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9EE6009A1
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  7 Jun 2005 19:01:00 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 19:01:00 -0400
From: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: My mistake
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: "Roberto C. Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: mutt-ng devel-r308 (Debian)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no 
        version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I didn't realize I was trying to connect via SSL over port 80.  Of
course, it should not work.

-Roberto

--=20
Roberto C. Sanchez
http://familiasanchez.net/~sanchezr

--jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCpicsTfhoonTOp2oRAmaSAKDi0xTk4rvk/50fU9796dYuAw6/HgCgrZkI
drZFqkNsSaoUussBlvL82hw=
=6h5d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--jkO+KyKz7TfD21mV--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to