Your message dated Fri, 30 May 2008 14:27:56 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line baobab has been removed from Debian, closing #373195
has caused the Debian Bug report #373195,
regarding few keywords in description
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
immediately.)
--
373195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=373195
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: baobab
Version: 2.3.1-1
Severity: wishlist
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
The description of the baobab apt package does not have some keywords I would
consider important, particularly "disk usage" (remember that the original
utility is called 'du'!). "Free space" probably would not hurt either (e.g.,
"Using baobab you can locate and delete large files to free up disk space").
That's the main use case of the tool after all.
Call me stupid, but I keep forgetting the name of baobab because I need it once
a month, and I always fail to re-discover it by searching the apt archive, and
have to use Google. This bug is reproducible: it has happened at least three
times ;)
I would also suggest to remove the technical details such as live directory
monitoring or ability to delete files from the description, but this a minor
issue.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFEjr78ZEjTEI4o1DsRAlZVAKDP7QT21zMcBWKizw6+bOR0IGHfGwCgn89M
ZzyVsGIWjNxVy95yTCsnjgU=
=q3yt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2.4.2-1.1+rm
The baobab package has been removed from Debian testing, unstable and
experimental, so I am now closing the bugs that were still opened
against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/424139 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
--
Marco Rodrigues
http://Marco.Tondela.org
--- End Message ---
