Your message dated Sun, 15 Mar 2009 08:16:35 GMT
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line xt has been removed from Debian, closing #434705
has caused the Debian Bug report #434705,
regarding xt: fails to read LOC field from dns if used with bin9-host instead
of host
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
434705: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=434705
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: xt
Version: 0.9.1-8+b1
Severity: normal
The xtraceroute said:
Didn't find "LOC" or "CNAME" where expected in the string from host!
This is what I got: "*.*.*.* location 60 55 0.000 N 101 57 0.000 E 638.00m 1m
10000m 10m
" ( I hide the real name with stars )
I found that is because it uses the host binary, and the bind9-host package's
host binary is translating "LOC" to "location", so xtraceroute can't find
the informations in the line.
Maybe xtraceroute should depend on host package, not on host|bind9-host ?
Or the code itself could be recognize the location word too...
After I installed host package ( it was remove the bind9-host package )
everything goes perfectly.
Harka Gyozo
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.14.2 (PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 0.9.1-8.1+rm
The xt package has been removed from Debian so we are closing
the bugs that were still opened against it.
For more information about this package's removal, read
http://bugs.debian.org/519743 . That bug might give the reasons why
this package was removed, and suggestions of possible replacements.
Don't hesitate to reply to this mail if you have any question.
Thank you for your contribution to Debian.
Kind regards,
--
Marco Rodrigues
--- End Message ---
