Your message dated Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:12:15 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Patch to clarify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2004 14:35:06 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 22 07:35:06 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cheviot5.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.233.122] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CL0VW-00041b-00; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 07:35:06 -0700
Received: from localhost (dynam4.ncl.ac.uk [128.240.58.147])
by cheviot5.ncl.ac.uk (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i9MEYvC0010026
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:34:57 +0100
Received: by localhost (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A4456837E; Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:35:27 +0100 (BST)
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 15:35:27 +0100
From: Mark Hymers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: clarify text on developers information page
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Y7xTucakfITjPcLV"
Content-Disposition: inline
Organization: None at all
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Newcastle-MailScanner-Information: Please contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] for more
information
X-Newcastle-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-Newcastle-MailScanner-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: bugs.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I found one line of text at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer
slightly confusing:
"A developer may explicitly mail the bug's submitter with an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
This implied to me at first reading that it would *only* email the
submitter and I had to ask on #debian-devel to clarify.
I've attached a patch which (in my opinion) cleans up the wording. It
also adds a little summary list of addresses and who they go to. You
may or may not wish to use this.
I was unsure whether to file this against debbugs or bugs.debian.org but
have sided with the latter as that's where I saw the problem initially.
Thanks,
Mark
--=20
Mark Hymers, University of Newcastle Medical School
Intercalating Medical Student (MBBS / PhD)
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="Dev.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Index: html/Developer.html.in
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
RCS file: /cvs/debbugs/source/html/Developer.html.in,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 Developer.html.in
--- html/Developer.html.in 10 Aug 2003 20:33:38 -0000 1.7
+++ html/Developer.html.in 22 Oct 2004 14:25:41 -0000
@@ -54,8 +54,9 @@ pass it on to the package maintainer, fi
logs for that bug report and forward it to a designated mailing list
(<code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>).
=20
-<p>A developer may explicitly mail the bug's submitter with an email to
-<var>nnn</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>.
+<p>Sending a message to <var>nnn</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</cod=
e>
+will explicitly email the submitter of the bug as well as the $gBug tracki=
ng
+system, package maintainer and mailing list.
=20
<p>If you wish to send a followup message which is not appropriate for
any mailing list you can do so by sending it to
@@ -75,6 +76,16 @@ both to <var>nnn</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
get two copies of it and each one will be forwarded to the designated
mailing list separately.
=20
+<h2>Quick summary of addresses and recipients</h2>
+<p>
+<ul>
+ <li><var>nnn</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>: BTS, Package maintainer,=
Bugs Mailing List
+ <li><var>nnn-submitter</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>: BTS, Package m=
aintainer, Bugs Mailing List, Submitter
+ <li><var>nnn-quiet</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>: BTS
+ <li><var>nnn-maintonly</var><code>[EMAIL PROTECTED]</code>: BTS, Package m=
aintainer
+ =20
+</ul>
+=20
<h2><A name=3D"severities">Severity levels</a></h2>
=20
<p>The $gBug system records a severity level with each $gBug report. This
--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBeRqvNIW6CNDsByMRAliWAKCHhy6P5N3ELTAp2qJQkofQbYuEWQCdEOhT
d2rwA7gXR0jMO8ifD2M+TRg=
=n/gg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 277797-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Jul 2005 17:12:29 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 31 10:12:29 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1DzHMT-0004Jc-00; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:12:29 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j6VHCRcG001798
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1DzHMG-0002j3-4X; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:12:16 -0700
Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:12:15 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Patch to clarify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.85.1, clamav-milter version 0.85 on
zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Sat, Jul 30, 2005 at 01:39:40AM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
> The following patch clarifies what [EMAIL PROTECTED] actually
> does; closes #277797.
Applied, thanks.
--=20
Matt
--rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC7QZvfNdgYxVXvBARAgTrAJ96lqNc8867XiU77+e676qtK3DKJQCcDMSX
yNrkIHQpN+Pd5ZmMlbJkFPI=
=RCLs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--rS8CxjVDS/+yyDmU--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
