Your message dated Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:44:25 -0500
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#544144: Closing this bug
has caused the Debian Bug report #544144,
regarding libitpp-dev: pkg-config for itpp doesn't produce include directories
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
544144: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=544144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libitpp-dev
Version: 4.0.6-3
Severity: important


When I do a 'pkg-config --cflags itpp', I expect pkg-config to output
the include directories for libitpp. However, all I get is the
following:

$ pkg-config --cflags itpp
-Wall -g -DNDEBUG -pipe -O2

The library flags seem okay, though.

I am linking one of my programs against IT++ and the build system uses
pkg-config to find the include / library paths. It fails because the
include paths don't seem to be configured. I find the includes at
/usr/include/itpp on my system.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
  APT prefers oldstable
  APT policy: (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.29-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to 
en_US)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash

Versions of packages libitpp-dev depends on:
ii  libitpp6gf                    4.0.6-3    C++ library of signal processing a

libitpp-dev recommends no packages.

libitpp-dev suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 05:36:37PM +0530, Akarsh Simha wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 04:05:15PM -0500, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> > Dear Akarsh,
> > 
> > I was wondering if my clarification with regard to this bug was
> > satisfactory to you. If it was, do you mind if I close this bug? If
> > not, could you tell me what suggestion you would have?
> 
> Dear Kumar,
> 
> The clarification is satisfactory. The bug could be closed. Thanks.

Thanks Akarsh.

Kumar
-- 
Kumar Appaiah


--- End Message ---

Reply via email to