Your message dated Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:24:15 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#323498: kernel-package: names new packages kernel-{image,
source, etc...} instead of linux-{image, source, etc...}
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 00:55:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 17:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from build.actusa.net [205.147.47.53]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5CDF-0000RM-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:25 -0700
Received: from build.actusa.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1])
by build.actusa.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id
j7H0tOIX030992
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:24 -0700
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by build.actusa.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j7H0tOWo030991;
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:24 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Stuart Sheldon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kernel-package: names new packages kernel-{image, source,
etc...} instead of linux-{image, source, etc...}
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.8
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:24 -0700
X-Debbugs-Cc: Unsure, or
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: kernel-package
Version: 9.005
Severity: minor
Not sure if this is a policy issue or not. If debian is moving to an new naming
convention for kernels, it would be nice to have our custom kernels match.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (100, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686-actusa
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages kernel-package depends on:
ii dpkg 1.10.28 Package maintenance system for Deb
ii dpkg-dev 1.10.28 Package building tools for Debian
ii gcc [c-compiler] 4:3.3.5-3 The GNU C compiler
ii gcc-3.3 [c-compiler] 1:3.3.5-13 The GNU C compiler
ii make 3.80-9 The GNU version of the "make" util
ii perl 5.8.4-8 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323498-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 03:25:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 20:25:59 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host-12-107-230-171.dtccom.net
(glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com) [12.107.230.171]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5EYx-0005Xe-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 20:25:59 -0700
Received: from glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com ([EMAIL PROTECTED]
[127.0.0.1])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with
ESMTP id j7H3OFLS003065
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT);
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:24:15 -0500
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id
j7H3OFlw003064;
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:24:15 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: glaurung.internal.golden-gryphon.com: srivasta set
sender to srivasta(va, manoj)@debian.org using -f
From: Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (va, manoj)>
To: Stuart Sheldon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#323498: kernel-package: names new packages kernel-{image,
source, etc...} instead of linux-{image, source, etc...}
Organization: The Debian Project
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
(i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACYAAAAwCAMAAABKbPgaAAAAM1BMVEUAAADIjH/0rp1KPz79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X-URL: http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050817:[EMAIL PROTECTED]::bmvOR+YtPHPi8C/5:001bYX7
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050817:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::K5ZEp341fcWU8FX4:000000000000000000000000000000000000002/jJE
X-Face: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/;Y^gTjR\T^"B'fbeuVGiyKrvbfKJl!^e|e:iu(kJ6c|QYB57LP*|t
&YlP~HF/=h:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:6Cj0kd#4]>*D,|0djf'CVlXkI,>aV4\}?d_KEqsN{Nnt7
78"OsbQ["56/!nisvyB/uA5Q.{)gm6?q.j71ww.>b9b]-sG8zNt%KkIa>xWg&1VcjZk[hBQ>]j~`Wq
Xl,y1a!(>6`UM{~'X[Y_,Bv+}=L\SS*mA8=s;!=O`ja|@PEzb&i0}Qp,`Z\:6:OmRi*
X-Hashcash: 1:25:050817:[EMAIL
PROTECTED]::V0w4pmCOyX8DIWvl:0000000000000000000000000000000000Wrnd
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 22:24:15 -0500
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Stuart Sheldon's
message of "Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:24 -0700")
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-CRM114-Score: -30.7471
X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: -30.7471 )
X-SA-Orig: -9.899, -30.7471
X-Spam-Value: -16.0516166666667
X-Grey: White
X-SA-Rep: -16.0516166666667 ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00,HASHCASH_25
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang version 2.51 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
on 192.168.1.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Hi,
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:55:24 -0700, Stuart Sheldon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Package: kernel-package Version: 9.005 Severity: minor
> Not sure if this is a policy issue or not. If debian is moving to an
> new naming convention for kernels, it would be nice to have our
> custom kernels match.
The kernel team has moved to using a new naming
convention. kernel-package allows either naming convention, but has
not yet moved to default. This is not a bug. Changing the name at
this point is likely to break the expectation of a large number of
users in the installed base, and break scripts (it would for me, for
one).
At some point of time it may be appropriate to change the
default naming convention.
manoj
--
This body is worn out with age, a nest of diseases and falling
apart. The mass of corruption disintegrates, and death is the end of
life. 148
Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/>
1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
