Your message dated Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:47:52 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Not a bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2004 12:58:27 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 19 04:58:27 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kmr.nada.kth.se [130.237.228.80]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CV8LK-000827-00; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 04:58:27 -0800
Received: from root by kmr.nada.kth.se with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1CV8LI-0007Yw-00; Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:58:24 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Mikael Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: spamassassin: Missing versioned dependency on libnet-dns-perl sabotages
URIDNSBL
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.99.5
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 13:58:24 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: spamassassin
Version: 3.0.1-1
Severity: minor
I'm running spamassassin from unstable on a woody system, hoping to be
able to use URIDNSBL from 3.0. I found I needed to explicitly pull
libnet-dns-perl from unstable to get it to work. Maybe a dependency or
at least recommends is in place (0.34 is needed, I had 0.28?).
/Mikael
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.0-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
Versions of packages spamassassin depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.38 Debian configuration management sy
ii libdigest-sha1-perl 2.10-1 NIST SHA-1 message digest algorith
ii libhtml-parser-perl 3.36-1 A collection of modules that parse
ii perl [libstorable-perl] 5.8.4-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii spamc 3.0.0-1 Client for SpamAssassin spam filte
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282053-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 04:48:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 16 21:48:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5Fqj-0000Sw-00; Tue, 16 Aug 2005 21:48:25 -0700
Received: (qmail 92378 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2005 04:47:54 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO gold.daf.ddts.net) ([EMAIL
PROTECTED]@24.156.103.196 with login)
by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 17 Aug 2005 04:47:54 -0000
Received: from duncf by gold.daf.ddts.net with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E5FqC-00056K-Fb
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:47:52 -0400
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 00:47:52 -0400
From: Duncan Findlay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Not a bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The versioned dependency is correct -- this should have been closed a
while ago, sorry! :-(
Thanks,
--=20
Duncan Findlay
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDAsF4qjUzNGvmnNARAjYgAJ44hwuprN78qAkBdYzFRKKc6MMxWgCfZsnq
vvkKL1kdTU44UPV1nxEFiBo=
=Chl1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--CUfgB8w4ZwR/yMy5--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
