Your message dated Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:33:44 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line initscripts: extra procfs filesystem (e.g. /chroots/sid/proc)
not umounted
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Aug 2005 15:57:41 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 15 08:57:41 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp.netsonic.fi [194.29.192.26]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4hLI-0007c9-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 08:57:41 -0700
Received: from sauna (kulho150.adsl.netsonic.fi [81.17.193.150])
by smtp.netsonic.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092671F8025;
Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:57:39 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from lindi by sauna with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1E4hLJ-0001UQ-00; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:57:41 +0300
From: Timo Juhani Lindfors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: initscripts: extra procfs filesystem (e.g. /chroots/sid/proc) not
umounted
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 18:57:41 +0300
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-1
Severity: normal
/etc/init.d/umountfs does not seem to umount procfs at all. This is
normally not a problem since /proc can be left mounted. However, in my
setup I have multiple proc filesystems mounted for chroots:
FILE: /etc/dchroot.conf
sid /chroots/sid
FILE: /etc/fstab
/dev/hdb1 /chroots ext2 defaults auto 0 2
proc /chroots/sid/proc proc defaults auto 0 0
When I shutdown the machine /chroots/sid/proc is not umounted and
keeps /chroots busy so it can't be umounted either. This causes long
fsck on every bootup for /dev/hdb1.
best regards,
Timo Lindfors
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323233-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 15:33:54 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 08:33:54 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] (7411)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EAr4b-0000eK-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:33:53 -0700
Received: from mail-mx1.uio.no ([129.240.10.29])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EAr4W-0000P2-Oz
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:33:48 +0200
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx1.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
id 1EAr4T-0007Pz-B9; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:33:45 +0200
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 4.44)
id 1EAr4S-0003yg-Gf; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:33:44 +0200
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: initscripts: extra procfs filesystem (e.g. /chroots/sid/proc) not
umounted
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 17:33:44 +0200
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.588, required 12,
autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -2.82, AWL 2.23,
UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL -5.00)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: initscripts
Version: 2.86.ds1-1
[Timo Juhani Lindfors]
> Whoops, indeed, my /etc/init.d/umountnfs.sh was from woody age. I
> copied new version from another sarge system and it seems to umount
> /chroots/proc and /chroots correctly now. Sorry for the bogus
> report.
OK. I'm closing this bug as the problem was just a misunderstanding
and an upgrade issue.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
