Your message dated Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:52:57 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line aspell-es: at install time : Could not build the hash file for
es
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Aug 2005 14:33:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Aug 17 07:33:43 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ip-206.net-81-220-89.toulouse.rev.numericable.fr
(supercit.mine.nu) [81.220.89.206]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E5Oz8-00013R-00; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 07:33:42 -0700
Received: by supercit.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DB6296E860B; Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:33:29 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
From: GroY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: aspell-es: at install time : Could not build the hash file for es
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.15
Date: Wed, 17 Aug 2005 16:33:29 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: aspell-es
Version: 1.8-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
During a dist-upgrade, I had the following message :
dictionaries-common: Running aspell-autobuildhash
Probl=E8mes lors de la reconstruction de la table de
hachage es de aspell
Erreur=A0: Could not build the hash file for es
Cette erreur a =E9t=E9 provoqu=E9e par le paquet qui fournit es
bien que l'erreur ne devienne visible que
lors de la post-installation d'un autre paquet.
Veuillez rapporter ce bogue au responsable du paquet qui
fournit le fichier es.
Tant que ce probl=E8me ne sera pas corrig=E9, vous ne pourrez
pas utiliser aspell avec es.
=
=20
Unfortunately, I have no idea of whet is the source of the problem, nor
what can be done to solve it :/
GroY
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=3DISO-8859-15) =
(ignored: LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages aspell-es depends on:
ii aspell 0.60.3-5 GNU Aspell spell-checker
ii dictionaries-common 0.49.2 Common utilities for spellin=
g dict
aspell-es recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 323605-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Sep 2005 15:55:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 01 08:55:25 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from edison.ccupm.upm.es [138.100.4.49]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EArPR-0006AA-00; Thu, 01 Sep 2005 08:55:25 -0700
Received: from mala.aq.upm.es (Agmartin.aq.upm.es [138.100.41.131])
by edison.ccupm.upm.es (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j81FtMEx002467;
Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:55:22 +0200
Received: by mala.aq.upm.es (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 4E155C584; Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:52:57 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 17:52:57 +0200
From: Agustin Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: aspell-es: at install time : Could not build the hash file for es
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 11:43:44AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> well, it seems to work perfectly :/
> i don t know what happened
> thanks
>
I am then closing the bug report.
Feel free to reopen it or open a new one if the problem appears again.
In that case, please send a log containing also the "neighbourhood"
of the error message so we can try to guess better what happened.
Thanks for your feedback,
--
Agustin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
