Your message dated Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:47:27 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#598151: unblock: mgltools-vision/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #598151,
regarding unblock: mgltools-vision/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
598151: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=598151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: freeze-exception
Please unblock package mgltools-vision
The current version explicitly depends on python2.5, still. I was just reminded
by Michael's email on
"binary packages with explicit python2.5 build dependency" to have this extra
look at -vision.
The other packages in the mgltools suite - to which vision is a bit of an
outside as it is about building
workflows with the other toools - have all experienced either NMUs or
independent updates ... or both.
The packages is 13 days in unstable now.
Many thanks
Steffen
unblock mgltools-vision/1.5.4.cvs.20100912-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 20:30 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 00:15 +0200, Steffen Moeller wrote:
> > Please unblock package mgltools-vision
> >
> > The current version explicitly depends on python2.5, still. I was just
> > reminded by Michael's email on binary packages with explicit python2.5
> > build dependency" to have this extra look at -vision.
>
> So far as I can see, the packages in both testing and unstable have an
> explicit run-time dependency on python2.5, despite the build-dependency
> change, so I'm not sure why it qualifies for an unblock, looking at the
> debdiff.
>
> The changelog is also a little confusing, moving from July 2010 to
> October 2009 and back to September 2010.
mgltools-vision is no longer in Squeeze; closing.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
