Your message dated Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:32:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#324478: fixed in llgal 0.11-1
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Aug 2005 10:21:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 22 03:21:51 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de [134.34.140.224]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E79R9-00024o-00; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 03:21:51 -0700
Received: from localhost (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1])
by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AA722BBE3;
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (honk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
id 23980-01; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:43 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from halley.zuhause (unknown [134.34.147.114])
by honk1.physik.uni-konstanz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24462BBE2;
Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by halley.zuhause (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 6DC2C28818C; Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:21 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 12:21:20 +0200
From: Wolfram Quester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: llgal: workaround for unusable EXIF comments
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.15
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
honk.physik.uni-konstanz.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: llgal
Version: 0.9.10-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
Hi,
I wanted to create an html gallery from some pictures I took with my
digital camera. I used digikam to edit the image (JPEG/JFIF) comments
and told llgal to use them for creating the captions. Sadly, I got no
captions, even if rdjpgcom showed me the right comments.
It took me some time to understand what's going on. The problem seems to
be that my camera puts some stuff in the UserComment field (exif.py
displays "UserComment: (0x9286) Undefined=3D[] @ 1886"), that can't be
properly interpreted by Image::Info. Since it is set though,
(($infos->{UserComment}) ne "") evaluates to true.
In the following, my JFIF-comments, stored in $infos->{Comment} are
ignored. To circumvent this, the attached patch turns the way llgal
considers the comments around. It first considers the JFIF
comments and only if they are empty uses the EXIF ones.
I could not test the behaviour with exif-comments though, since all
programs I have at hand edit the JFIF-Comments, even exiftran.
removes trailing
Perhaps we should give the user the ability to choose which comments to
use on the commandline (--cte, --ctj) and get a sound default as honour
JFIF before EXIF or vice versa. Since JFIF is more commonly used and
more flexible I'd plead for using JFIF as default.
If you want, I can prepare a patch for this.
I did not find a llgal mailing list, so I used debian's BTS for this
report in case other people have comments to this too.
Thanks for listening,
Wolfi
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-wjq
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.UTF-8 (charmap=3DUTF-8) (ignor=
ed: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Versions of packages llgal depends on:
ii imagemagick 6:6.2.3.6-3 Image manipulation programs
ii libimage-info-perl 1.16-2 allows extraction of meta info=
rmat
ii libimage-size-perl 2.992-1 determine the size of images i=
n se
ii liburi-perl 1.35-1 Manipulates and accesses URI s=
trin
ii perl 5.8.7-4 Larry Wall's Practical Extract=
ion=20
llgal recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDCacgH0o2mefAfsQRArKeAJ9268uRWfRpInwJ1Wz/O1JiEPwjiACggnaZ
5K4Ga9K39+cCHGm3dVaRT/s=
=7kkC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 324478-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2005 21:38:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 09 14:38:21 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EDqTe-0000I5-00; Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:32:06 -0700
From: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#324478: fixed in llgal 0.11-1
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 14:32:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: llgal
Source-Version: 0.11-1
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
llgal, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
llgal_0.11-1.diff.gz
to pool/main/l/llgal/llgal_0.11-1.diff.gz
llgal_0.11-1.dsc
to pool/main/l/llgal/llgal_0.11-1.dsc
llgal_0.11-1_all.deb
to pool/main/l/llgal/llgal_0.11-1_all.deb
llgal_0.11.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/l/llgal/llgal_0.11.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated llgal package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 23:34:08 +0200
Source: llgal
Binary: llgal
Architecture: source all
Version: 0.11-1
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Brice Goglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
llgal - Online gallery generator
Closes: 324478 325171
Changes:
llgal (0.11-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New upstream release.
* Improved support for JFIF and/or EXIF image comments, closes: #324478.
* Does not use Perl filetest operators that do not support ACL,
closes: #325171.
* Install the UPGRADE file.
* Add debian/watch.
Files:
fd346af24e341e9538246bdc309324d9 564 web optional llgal_0.11-1.dsc
caad9956b486529aa7eac249a049946a 42956 web optional llgal_0.11.orig.tar.gz
4bfe5bc7d1235c698e80eec52547d36a 2295 web optional llgal_0.11-1.diff.gz
24bf327975e1dbe23f70c61aae6eebfc 42314 web optional llgal_0.11-1_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDIfsGIae1O4AJae8RAqBQAJ9Q/V0l34i1aB8E6bJltv3dpkaBZQCfeQxi
tiigWKP/crb1dkQEejiJEZk=
=Yn+u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
