Your message dated Fri, 2 Dec 2011 23:03:44 +0100
with message-id
<CAKNHny_jiLL9HSBVrm3k1mtRB66WYpNjkB97T5nz_PtCAt8=q...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#638643: packagekit results in no results with
graphical package filter.
has caused the Debian Bug report #638643,
regarding packagekit results in no results with graphical package filter.
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
638643: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638643
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: packagekit
Version: 0.6.15-1
Hi.
I've installed packagekit for use of novice users, as a result the
filter for graphical packages only is very important; but unfortunately
it gives no results at all with this filter on.
I've tried this on gnome-packagekit.
Thanks.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Okay, thanks!
The backend determines graphical applications on their sections. This
can easily be solved if DEP-11[1] is accepted and implemented. (We're
working on this) Maybe there's also a chance to use DebTags for this.
Cheers,
Matthias
------------
[1]: http://wiki.debian.org/AppStreamDebianProposal
2011/12/2 dE . <[email protected]>:
> On 11/17/11 21:09, Matthias Klumpp wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>> Which filter have you tried? Is this issue still valid with the latest
>> PackageKit version available in unstable?
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>>
>> 2011/8/20 dE .<[email protected]>:
>>>
>>> Package: packagekit
>>> Version: 0.6.15-1
>>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>> I've installed packagekit for use of novice users, as a result the filter
>>> for graphical packages only is very important; but unfortunately it gives
>>> no
>>> results at all with this filter on.
>>>
>>> I've tried this on gnome-packagekit.
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>>
> This appears to have been fixed, but the graphical filter is not upto the
> mark, it simply shows results on basis of the section the package belongs to
> -- this may be a gnome/kde library which's something not graphical.
>
> Anyway, this bug may close.
--- End Message ---
