Your message dated Fri, 6 Jul 2012 16:43:19 +0100
with message-id
<capq4b8n+5zkqc3qpkrfpwhggxuuc9a5az1kgwy54unk0jq3...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Closing orphan/obsolete bugs (emacs21 with tag fixed-upstream)
has caused the Debian Bug report #117580,
regarding superfluous "right-arrow continuation character" in *Buffer List*
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
117580: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=117580
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: emacs21
Version: 21.1-2
Severity: wishlist
Under X, my emacs21 buffers are (I believe) the standard 80-columns wide.
If I visit a buffer with an appropriately long path, then the listing in
*Buffer List* can appear complete, but the little right-arrow
(continuation) symbol still appears at the right hand side.
I can duplicate this by starting "emacs -q", opening (C-x C-f) the
(nonexistent) file "~/tmp/a_path_with_many_characters" (in Fundamental
mode), then inspecting the *Buffer List* (C-x C-b). The continuation arrow
appears even though the path is visible in full.
--
Paul Kimoto
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hello,
Thanks for your interest in improving Debian, and sorry that the bugs
were not fully resolved or closed in due time.
emacs21 packages have been removed from testing in 2009 [1], not
present even in the current stable. Consequently, these bugs are now
orphan (without maintainer assigned) so they probably will not be
attended/noticed further.
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/e/emacs21.html
The bugs deemed valid are going to be verified and reassigned, but the
current bugs that I'm closing now are very ancient (more than 10 years
sometimes) and marked as fixed-upstream years ago, with no recent
input, and are supposed to be fixed in emacs22 at the latest.
Please comment if you want think that some of the raised questions are
still pending and need to be addressed differently (e.g., reassigned
to other packages, etc.).
Cheers.
--- End Message ---
