Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:42:05 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line close bug #331215
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Oct 2005 11:31:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 02 04:31:19 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EM23q-00048G-00; Sun, 02 Oct 2005 04:31:19 -0700
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (p508E07EA.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [80.142.7.234])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9963335A3;
Sun, 2 Oct 2005 13:31:13 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: moinmoin-common has a missing dependency
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sun, 02 Oct 2005 13:42:14 +0000
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: moinmoin-common
Version: 1.3.4.really.1.3.5rc1-1
Severity: important
Hi Jonas
The package moinmoin-common has to depend on python-moinmoin.
You can't use moinmoin-common without the code in python-moinmoin,
so please add the dependency.
The dependency is also important for an upgrade from moin to the
new versions. moinmoin-common replaces moin, but it is not enough to get
moinmoin-common, the user should also get the python-moinmoin !!!
I know that this was also described in antoher bug, but I think this
report gives a new issue.
I am curious about your answer ;=)
Greetings
Steffen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (700, 'unstable'), (600, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-kanotix-11
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15)
moinmoin-common depends on no packages.
Versions of packages moinmoin-common recommends:
ii python-moinmoin 1.3.4.really.1.3.5rc1-1 Python clone of WikiWiki - dummy l
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 331215-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 20:42:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 13:42:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from shadowland.snow-crash.org (ned.snow-crash.org) [80.190.250.253]
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1EVb3P-0000if-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:42:23 -0700
Received: from [192.168.2.5] (p54B3E790.dip.t-dialin.net [84.179.231.144])
by ned.snow-crash.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07857335AF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:42:22 +0200 (CEST)
From: Steffen Joeris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: close bug #331215
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:42:05 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed;
boundary="nextPart1170237.FgmAnR5EYd";
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
micalg=pgp-sha1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,SUBJ_HAS_UNIQ_ID
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--nextPart1170237.FgmAnR5EYd
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Hi Jonas
I read your explanation and thought about it again.
I agree to your opinion.
I close this bug now.
Greetings
Steffen
--nextPart1170237.FgmAnR5EYd
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBDYo0h62zWxYk/rQcRAgFLAKC1zZaPhwEUj2A1N3lB8ROHtryNzQCfbhW9
X6lECKIesd2OVa312JefTqI=
=v0Id
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nextPart1170237.FgmAnR5EYd--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
