Your message dated Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:47:44 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#268595: fixed in gengetopt 2.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Aug 2004 10:13:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Aug 28 03:13:38 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de [134.2.12.32] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1C10DK-0008JS-00; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 03:13:38 -0700
Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1])
        by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id 27999113; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:13:07 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (mx5 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP
 id 16236-04; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:13:05 +0200 (DFT)
Received: from dual (semeai.Informatik.Uni-Tuebingen.De [134.2.15.66])
        by mx5.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP
        id AD80E10D; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:13:03 +0200 (MST)
Received: from mrvn by dual with local (Exim 4.34)
        id 1C10CX-0006Jj-Sk; Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:12:50 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gengetopt: Build-Depends on build-essential libstdc++-dev
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 12:12:44 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Goswin von Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new (McAfee AntiVirus) at 
informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: gengetopt
Version: 2.10-1
Severity: minor
Tags: sarge,sid

Hi,

libstdc++-dev is a purely virtual package and as such not allowed as
direct Build-Depends (only allowed in Build-Depends:
libstdc++-5-3.3-dev | libstdc++-dev). Further more libstdc++-dev is
build-essential already so the Build-Depends entry is unneeded.

MfG
        Goswin

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.5-amd64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=de_DE

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 268595-close) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Oct 2005 20:54:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 28 13:54:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1EVb8a-0003Ov-00; Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:47:44 -0700
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#268595: fixed in gengetopt 2.10-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 13:47:44 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Source: gengetopt
Source-Version: 2.10-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
gengetopt, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

gengetopt_2.10-2.diff.gz
  to pool/main/g/gengetopt/gengetopt_2.10-2.diff.gz
gengetopt_2.10-2.dsc
  to pool/main/g/gengetopt/gengetopt_2.10-2.dsc
gengetopt_2.10-2_i386.deb
  to pool/main/g/gengetopt/gengetopt_2.10-2_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated gengetopt package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 20:52:03 +0200
Source: gengetopt
Binary: gengetopt
Architecture: source i386
Version: 2.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 gengetopt  - skeleton main.c generator
Closes: 268595 326523
Changes: 
 gengetopt (2.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA Upload
   * Change maintainer to QA Group
   * Recompile for CXX transition
   * Remove unneccessary build-dependency on libstdc++-dev
     (Closes: #268595)
   * Update config.sub/config.guess to fix FTBFS on GNU/k*BSD
     (Closes: #326523)
   * Update FSF address in copyright file
Files: 
 d8c3898d92e7932091e00ff2ef0606cd 579 devel optional gengetopt_2.10-2.dsc
 9ff83bfe4e727c9ddf7684461a640fc1 20484 devel optional gengetopt_2.10-2.diff.gz
 44bed6fa864611abc606c00a3a725901 118404 devel optional 
gengetopt_2.10-2_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDYnU6Qbn06FtxPfARAmdrAKD9wAJFJMB1Ott64ylEBiHeM0xCAACgqewE
m2WRT2nORqSIoZ31kBfaEq4=
=HfvM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to