Your message dated Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:14:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#334588: no bug
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 20:08:56 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 13:08:56 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from lilzmailso02.liwest.at [212.33.55.24]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERxlX-0006Qt-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 13:08:55 -0700
Received: from cm231-169.liwest.at ([81.10.231.169] helo=proxy.es18.local)
by lilzmailso02.liwest.at with esmtp (Exim 4.24)
id 1ERxl1-0006wL-OT; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:08:23 +0200
Received: from debian.es18.local (juergen [192.168.9.2])
by proxy.es18.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60EE5F2B40;
Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:08:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by debian.es18.local (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 2881D3003270B; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:08:24 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Juergen Richtsfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: perlmagick: hangs and uses all cpu time
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:08:23 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Score: -4.8 (----)
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: perlmagick
Version: 6:6.2.4.5-0.2
Severity: important
I made a small perl script to render my digicam photos as a collage for a
desktop wallpaper. On my old machine (a AMD Athlon(K7)), it worked very well
(also Debian Sid). On my new Amd64 machine, the program sometimes hangs, uses
all the CPU-time and creates a huge (several gigs) tempfile in /tmp thats name
starts with 'magick-'. I didn't have time to trace it to the correct call yet,
but as soon I have time, I'll do that.
You can get the script from http://juergen.inimeo.at/projects/wallpaper.plx
As the description on the website is in german only, here is a short summary.
./wallpaper.plx <a directory to scan> <inputAndOutputFile>
e.g.
./wallpaper.plx ~/fotos/ wallpaper.jpg
the script is very short. The problem doesn't occur all the time, but when
executing it about 20 times, I always get the problem.
regards
juergen richtsfeld
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-10-1
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages perlmagick depends on:
ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.2-10 high-quality block-sorting file co
ii libc6 2.3.5-7 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdps1 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Display PostScript (DPS) client li
ii libfreetype6 2.1.10-1 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii libice6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 Inter-Client Exchange library
ii libjpeg62 6b-10 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG
ii liblcms1 1.13-1 Color management library
ii libmagick9 6:6.2.4.5-0.2 Image manipulation library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.8rel-5 PNG library - runtime
ii libsm6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System Session Management
ii libtiff4 3.7.4-1 Tag Image File Format (TIFF) libra
ii libx11-6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System protocol client li
ii libxext6 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System miscellaneous exte
ii libxml2 2.6.22-1 GNOME XML library
ii perl 5.8.7-7 Larry Wall's Practical Extraction
ii perl-base [perlapi-5.8.7] 5.8.7-7 The Pathologically Eclectic Rubbis
ii xlibs 6.8.2.dfsg.1-9 X Window System client libraries m
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.3-6 compression library - runtime
perlmagick recommends no packages.
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 334588-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Nov 2005 01:14:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 17:14:16 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ([134.2.170.62])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EddmZ-0001hq-TQ
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 17:14:16 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id
326174A65B
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:14:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (antares [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with LMTP id 14439-05 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:14:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by antares.tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 0DB964AD67; Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:14:13 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 02:14:12 +0100
From: Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#334588: no bug
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at
tat.physik.uni-tuebingen.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 01:43:54AM +0100, Juergen Richtsfeld wrote:
> now i had time to investigate the problem. the thing is, that the
> exif-resolution is very often returned as a fraction number. the error in the
> script is, that this fraction isn't calculated, only the top value of the
> fraction was used, which resulted in a *very* big tmp file when executing the
> rescale method.
>
> so this is just a user error.
Thanks for following up on your report. So I'm marking it as closed now
on your behalf.
Regards,
Daniel.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
