Your message dated Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:06 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#305232: bash should recommend passwd
(add-shell/remove-shell) instead of depending on it
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Apr 2005 20:16:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 18 13:16:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from cluster2.uol.ua (cluster1.uol.ua) [195.123.61.210] (root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DNcfW-00053T-00; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 13:16:31 -0700
Received: from [194.242.118.101] (account [EMAIL PROTECTED] HELO localhost)
by cluster1.uol.ua ( Ukraine Online SMTP 4.2.8)
with ESMTP-TLS id 17981707 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:32:05
+0300
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 23:18:32 +0300
From: Alexander Gattin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: bash should recommend passwd (add-shell/remove-shell) instead of
depending on it
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Debbugs-Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: bash
Version: 2.05b-26
Severity: normal
Tags: sarge sid
Hi!
What I really wanted is reopening bug #265982 (titled
"Please do not depend on passwd at all, bad in chroot
etc.")
The problem is claimed to be dealed with, but it seems
to be mistreated a bit:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache show bash
Package: bash
...
Version: 3.0-14
Replaces: bash-doc (<= 2.05-1), bash-completion
Depends: base-files (>= 2.1.12), passwd (>= 1:4.0.3-10)
Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-1)
...
Version: 2.05b-26
Replaces: bash-doc (<= 2.05-1), bash-completion
Depends: base-files (>= 2.1.12), passwd (>= 1:4.0.3-10)
Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.3.2.ds1-4), libncurses5 (>= 5.4-1)
...
Version: 2.05a-11
Replaces: bash-doc (<= 2.05-1), bash-completion
Depends: base-files (>= 2.1.12)
Pre-Depends: libc6 (>= 2.2.4-4), libncurses5 (>= 5.2.20020112a-1)
The original reporter asked "Please do not depend on
passwd at all". I think his request was reasonable and
anyway, as you have made calls to add-shell and
remove-shell _conditional_, it would be good and
logical to "recommend" passwd instead of depending on
it.
P.S.
BTW, it's quite possible that those scripts will be
moved from passwd to separate package or to an
existing essential package like debianutils...
--
WBR,
xrgtn
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (501, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-grsec
Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Versions of packages bash depends on:
ii base-files 3.1.2 Debian base system miscellaneous f
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.4-4 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii passwd 1:4.0.3-31sarge1 change and administer password and
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 305232-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2005 15:21:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Dec 10 07:21:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de ([130.149.17.13] ident=root)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1El6X8-0007Oe-Hp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 07:21:10 -0800
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.17.13])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA00721;
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:08 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06E46F2BC;
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:08 +0100 (MET)
Received: from mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (bueno [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP
id 27906-31; Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:06 +0100 (MET) 11221
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.19.1])
by mailhost.cs.tu-berlin.de (Postfix) with ESMTP;
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:06 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.8/Submit) id jBAFL6on018885;
Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:06 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:21:06 +0100
To: Alexander Gattin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#305232: bash should recommend passwd (add-shell/remove-shell)
instead of depending on it
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 17) "Jumbo Shrimp" XEmacs Lucid
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cs.tu-berlin.de
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Version: 3.0-17
bash now depends on debianutils instead of passwd.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
