Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:09:45 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line forgot to close this in changelog
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 4 May 2005 22:46:18 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed May 04 15:46:18 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dke79.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl (mp.pl.eu.org) [83.24.8.79]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DTSdF-0008EK-00; Wed, 04 May 2005 15:46:18 -0700
Received: from mike by mp.pl.eu.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1DTScj-0003M3-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 05 May 2005 00:45:45 +0200
Date: Thu, 5 May 2005 00:45:45 +0200
From: Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nsca: uninstallable with inetd other than netkit-inetd
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.11
X-PGP: 1024D/6B757C5B; 1C98 622F 6A6D 822D 3E95 2626 14EB 98C1 6B75 7C5B;
2004-02-29 -- 2006-02-28
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Sender: Michal Politowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: nsca
Version: 2.4-3
Severity: normal
openbsd-inetd and inetutils-inetd don't contain /etc/init.d/inetd
Also there seems to be a (theoretical only, I guess) chance that there
will be no inetd (or netbase) at all when nsca is installed
- no dependency, and these aren't exactly Essential.
Setting up nsca (2.4-3) ...
/var/lib/dpkg/info/nsca.postinst: 21: /etc/init.d/inetd: not found
dpkg: error processing nsca (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 127
Errors were encountered while processing:
nsca
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.10
Locale: LANG=3Dpl_PL, LC_CTYPE=3Dpl_PL (charmap=3DISO-8859-2)
Versions of packages nsca depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-21 GNU C Library: Shared librarie=
s an
ii libmcrypt4 2.5.7-5 De-/Encryption Library
ii nagios-text 2:1.3-cvs.20050402-2 A host/service/network monitor=
ing=20
--=20
Micha=B3 Politowski
Talking has been known to lead to communication if practised carelessly.
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCeVCZFOuYwWt1fFsRAtdAAJ9Bt66VAhjYh3UlZMVBqSZBjKURiACdFuCl
N9afsZBFYwq1P1EyDW6/bwA=
=56HM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307718-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 11:10:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 03:10:46 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl092-235-170.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.235.170]
helo=stout.gradientsolutions.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElP5z-0004Jy-3M
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:10:26 -0800
Received: from sativa.seanius.net (sativa.yale-house.net [10.0.0.113])
by stout.gradientsolutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0AD1B9F0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:09:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7E2F4B837; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:09:45 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:09:45 -0500
From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: forgot to close this in changelog
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
nsca now uses an init script-based method instead of inetd,
and thus should configure regardless of which inetd is installed.
sean
--=20
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnAj5ynjLPm522B0RAshdAJ9e0i+OIbvyxZmTiklkSrVw2ausVgCdEBNR
0wTLOKbRMw8dGv8Hb8XNswM=
=gfAW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
