Your message dated Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:16:05 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line (no subject)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2005 12:11:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 25 04:11:12 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.lobefin.net ([82.71.90.98])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfcQ4-0002Kn-20
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 04:11:12 -0800
Received: from lobefin.net
([82.71.90.97] helo=hadrian.lobefin.net ident=Debian-exim)
by mail.lobefin.net with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1EfcQ1-0007EQ-FA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:09 +0000
Received: from steve by hadrian.lobefin.net with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EfcQ2-0007kN-Jc
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:10 +0000
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:10 +0000
From: Stephen Gran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: nsca: please provide a way to install send_nsca without nagios +
dependencies
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 6.3
X-OS: Linux hadrian 2.6.8-2-686-smp i686
X-Uptime: 59 days
X-Latin: Hodie septimo Kalendas Decembres MMDCCLVIII ab urbe condita est
X-Date: Today is Prickle-Prickle, the 37th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3171
X-DDate: Only 2430912 Shopping Days Left Before X-Day. Wibble.
X-Motto: debian/rules
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Authenticated-Sender: steve
X-Scanned-By: ClamAV 0.87.1/1195 on mail.lobefin.net; Fri, 25 Nov 2005 12:11:09
+0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: nsca
Severity: normal
Hello,
I am trying right now to set up a few distributed network test stations.
The idea is that they will check a few network services and report the
remote availability to a central nagios server, via send_nsca. While
this binary does not itself need anything to speak of, trying to apt-get
install it means that I pull in nagios, apache, and a half million other
things.
I can see two ways to resolve this:
split send_nsca and nsca into two packages (which seems silly, as they
would have one binary apiece, but is not unprecedented), or relax the
depends to a recommends. I think the first is actually a better option
as admins installing nsca will actually want it to be useful, and nsca
itself is only useful on the nagios host.
Thanks,
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686-smp
Locale: LANG=3Den_US.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US.ISO-8859-1 (charmap=3DISO=
-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.ISO-8859-1)
--=20
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| ,''`. Stephen Gran |
| : :' : [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| `. `' Debian user, admin, and developer |
| `- http://www.debian.org |
-----------------------------------------------------------------
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDhv9eSYIMHOpZA44RAgo7AJ0V4qMEFHn3pJjta6Yg0OnaCdvp6wCg0U8D
OwceaEW39G6BPyPGkX0Xr1Q=
=LGZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 340726-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Dec 2005 11:16:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 11 03:16:39 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dsl092-235-170.phl1.dsl.speakeasy.net ([66.92.235.170]
helo=stout.gradientsolutions.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ElPC3-0006HY-JA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 03:16:39 -0800
Received: from sativa.seanius.net (sativa.yale-house.net [10.0.0.113])
by stout.gradientsolutions.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B3301B9F0
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:16:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sativa.seanius.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3557CB837; Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:16:05 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2005 06:16:05 -0500
From: sean finney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,NOSUBJECT
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Version: 2.4-4
fixed in the version above
sean
--=20
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDnAp1ynjLPm522B0RAnrvAJ0YNvFQDZQyppS4L9n2822u/SQSdwCeIo1/
siBmrrdnODYOTJkhRxv6vCc=
=tlZo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
