Your message dated Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:39:16 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line done (was: Re: doc-debian: FAQ: Where do these codenames come
from?)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Nov 2002 05:04:43 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Nov 12 23:04:43 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from smtp1.apol.com.tw (smtp.ht.net.tw) [203.79.224.62]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18Bphj-00081z-00; Tue, 12 Nov 2002 23:04:43 -0600
Received: from debian (TC218-187-77-143.2-4.pl.apol.com.tw [218.187.77.143])
by smtp.ht.net.tw (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA15339373
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 13:04:38 +0800 (CST)
Received: from jidanni by debian with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18BmRa-0001Uz-00; Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:35:50 +0800
From: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: doc-debian: Where do these codenames come from?
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 09:35:50 +0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_03_06,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: doc-debian
Version: 3.0
Severity: minor
I'm supposed to refile this bug.
From: Josip Rodin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#168629: www.debian.org: pages need a <h1> or any header at
top, etc.
To: Dan Jacobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:04:37PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> Package: www.debian.org
> Version: N/A; reported 2002-11-11
> Severity: minor
>
> Please add a H1 header and a little introduction _at the top_ to
> http://buildd.debian.org/stats/
>
> Same with
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/stable_probs.html
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/testing_probs.html
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/unstable_probs.html
> while you're at it.
These aren't ours to edit, sorry. You'll have to ask [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Also search for all files that link to the frustrating
> http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/
> and eliminate the middleman.
I removed all of these a little while ago.
(I recommended that the above redirection is done with a 302 Redirect,
too...)
> I'm reading http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives and theirs a
> link to http://www.debian.org/doc/FAQ/ch-ftparchives.en.html#s-pools
> which is in another file instead of just linking to the bottom of this
> current file! Plenty more of these here too.
It's the same file, it just has the explicit language extension.
BTW the changed ftp-master.d.o/testing reference has been committed in that
file a while ago as well. :) This will propagate semi-automatically to
/doc/FAQ, soonish.
> "5.3.2 Where do these codenames come from?" should have a link to the
> sid story...
Please file a separate bug on the doc-debian package.
> On http://www.debian.org/ top page, the word woody should be mentioned
> each time "3.0" appears, perhaps.
It's just a code name...
> On http://www.debian.org/releases/:
> <dt>unstable</dt>
> This is the third item in DL list on this page. However, you have not
> linked it like the other two!!
That's because releases/unstable is an oxymoron. The page is not linked and
it only exists so that people who try to guess things, like yourself :)
don't see a 404 error.
> The ``unstable'' distribution is called sid.
> On this page mention that this doesn't change.
(How would you phrase that?)
> http://www.debian.org/devel/testing
> Debian ``testing'' distribution
> those quotes look real bad in HTML, are you sure you still want to use
> them and not others? Same for many other pages.
That's usually because the default fonts have been changed in the last few
years to make one of these quotes almost entirely vertical, instead of
slightly bent to the side... we never bothered to go change them all.
Please file separate bug reports for each bug, they're a pain to handle when
they're lumped in one big bug.
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.18-k7 #1 Sun Apr 14 13:19:11 EST 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 168881-done) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Dec 2005 08:39:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Dec 12 00:39:49 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gelfand.mdcc.cx ([80.126.189.155] helo=stegun.mdcc.cx)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1EljDp-0000au-Ao
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 00:39:49 -0800
Received: from nagy.mdcc.cx (nagy.mdcc.cx [192.168.26.30])
by stegun.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id E64EA72FF
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:39:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: by nagy.mdcc.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id D41B22AC49F; Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:39:16 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 09:39:16 +0100
From: Joost van Baal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: done (was: Re: doc-debian: FAQ: Where do these codenames come from?)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5Wo9T3dGHPT+4OQz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 8FC6 A40E 31B8 7E0E 2270 D7A9 0606 9CF2 9694 57F0
X-PGP-Key-ID: 0x969457F0
X-PGP-Key: http://mdcc.cx/~joostvb/joostvb_key.asc
X-Accept-Language: nl, en
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--5Wo9T3dGHPT+4OQz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi,
Op wo 7 dec 2005 om 01:02:26 +0100 schreef Joost van Baal:
>=20
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2002 at 01:04:37PM +0800, Dan Jacobson wrote:
> > "5.3.2 Where do these codenames come from?" should have a link to the
> > sid story...
>=20
> The Debian GNU/Linux FAQ says:
>=20
> ``So far they have been characters taken from the movie "Toy Story" by
> Pixar.''
>=20
> It features a description of the characters too. Imho anybody
> interested in the story can easily find additional notes elsewhere. I
> don't think more links are needed.
>=20
> If no-one stand up and objects, I'll close this bug soonish.
Done.
Bye,
Joost
--5Wo9T3dGHPT+4OQz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)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=mDxc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--5Wo9T3dGHPT+4OQz--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
