Your message dated Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:44:48 -0600
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#348063: r-doc-html: 7.1 Reading from sockets -
contradictory/confusing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 14:23:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 06:23:05 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ptb-relay02.plus.net ([212.159.14.213] helo=ptb-relay04.plus.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExmJ7-0005Ee-O3
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:23:05 -0800
Received: from [212.159.16.190] (helo=localhost)
by ptb-relay04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1ExmIc-0002jx-Qi
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:22:34 +0000
Received: from gpk by localhost with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1ExmIb-00008A-Cc; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:22:33 +0000
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: r-doc-html: 7.1 Reading from sockets - contradictory/confusing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:22:33 +0000
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: r-doc-html
Version: 2.2.0.final-4
Severity: normal
The paragraph has unclear references, and I have no idea what
it actually means.
> Base R comes with some facilities to communicate via BSD sockets on systems
> that support them (...). One potential problem....
> For new projects it is suggested that socket connections are used instead.
"Used instead"? Instead of what?
>The earlier low-level interface is given by functions make.socket,
>read.socket, write.socket and close.socket.
"earlier"? Earlier than what?
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 348063-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Jan 2006 19:45:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 14 11:45:22 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net ([216.148.227.85])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1ExrL0-0008PC-1H
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:45:22 -0800
Received: from basebud.nulle.part
(c-67-174-11-185.hsd1.il.comcast.net[67.174.11.185])
by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP
id <2006011419445001400dkv98e>; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:44:51 +0000
Received: from edd by basebud.nulle.part with local (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
id 1ExrKS-00041D-UE; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:44:48 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:44:48 -0600
To: Greg Kochanski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#348063: r-doc-html: 7.1 Reading from sockets -
contradictory/confusing
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.4.1
From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER,
RCVD_IN_SORBS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
I am closing this here as you already reported it at R Bugs.
Dirk
On 14 January 2006 at 14:22, Greg Kochanski wrote:
| Package: r-doc-html
| Version: 2.2.0.final-4
| Severity: normal
|
|
| The paragraph has unclear references, and I have no idea what
| it actually means.
|
|
|
| > Base R comes with some facilities to communicate via BSD sockets on systems
that support them (...). One potential problem....
| > For new projects it is suggested that socket connections are used instead.
|
| "Used instead"? Instead of what?
|
|
| >The earlier low-level interface is given by functions make.socket,
read.socket, write.socket and close.socket.
|
| "earlier"? Earlier than what?
|
| -- System Information:
| Debian Release: testing/unstable
| APT prefers testing
| APT policy: (500, 'testing')
| Architecture: i386 (i686)
| Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
| Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
| Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
|
| -- no debconf information
|
--
Hell, there are no rules here - we're trying to accomplish something.
-- Thomas A. Edison
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
