Your message dated Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:20:36 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in previous version
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2005 20:17:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Apr 03 13:17:53 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.avmedia.cz [212.24.151.218]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DIBXc-0006Sr-00; Sun, 03 Apr 2005 13:17:53 -0700
Received: from mpraha (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by server-praha (Postfix on Spraha) with SMTP id E7CF93008AEF8;
Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.avmedia.cz (Postfix on Spraha, from userid 0)
id C153B3008AEF7; Sun, 3 Apr 2005 22:17:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Dan Ohnesorg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libpam-ldap: Assertion `str != ((void *)0)' failed
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.2
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2005 22:17:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: libpam-ldap
Version: 169-1
Severity: important
while changing password with pam_password exop I get:
splzen:/etc# passwd uherek
New password:
Re-enter new password:
passwd:
/home/roland/debian/openldap/build/2.1.30/openldap2-2.1.30/libraries/liblber/encode.c
:327: ber_put_string: Assertion `str != ((void *)0)' failed.
Aborted
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-1-386
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
Versions of packages libpam-ldap depends on:
ii debconf 1.4.30.11 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libldap2 2.1.30-3 OpenLDAP libraries
ii libpam0g 0.76-22 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
-- debconf information excluded
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 302927-done) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Jan 2006 02:20:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 19 18:20:12 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns.snowman.net ([66.92.160.21])
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Ezlsp-00075x-SI
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 18:20:12 -0800
Received: by ns.snowman.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 3B84117AD9; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:20:36 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 21:20:36 -0500
From: Stephen Frost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Fixed in previous version
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ezqXZXfrrOesyJ+v"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/
X-Info: http://www.snowman.net
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.4.24ns.3.0 (i686)
X-Uptime: 21:19:43 up 222 days, 18:29, 13 users, load average: 0.19, 0.09, 0.08
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--ezqXZXfrrOesyJ+v
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Greetings,
Looking back at this, the version the error was reported on (169-1)
was before the bug was fixed (171-1). Closing this accordingly.
Thanks,
Stephen
--ezqXZXfrrOesyJ+v
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFD0EjzrzgMPqB3kigRAk7FAJ9frf0d06EQxzfwsasPYAfe6CTiZwCfaGvI
Kj4V0d2b7GU9xuJI+7b5Fi8=
=k7hH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ezqXZXfrrOesyJ+v--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
