Your message dated Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:22:26 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line zoph: New upstream version 0.4 available
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Nov 2005 08:51:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 19 00:51:23 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from a.mail.sonic.net ([64.142.16.245])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EdORP-0004I5-KG
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:51:23 -0800
Received: from gobo.zelnet (gobo.doorstop.net [69.12.143.241])
        by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id jAJ8pL5f006735
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
        Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:51:22 -0800
Received: from vineet by gobo.zelnet with local (Exim 4.54)
        id 1EdOPw-00057d-9N; Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:49:52 -0800
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Vineet Kumar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: zoph: New upstream version 0.4 available
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 00:49:52 -0800
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: zoph
Version: 0.3.3-14
Severity: wishlist

According to the sourceforge site, zoph 0.4 has been released, and some
of the new features (especially the bulk edit!) sound really great.
Please package the new release.  I'm willing to help out in any way
possible.

Thanks,
Vineet


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (700, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.12-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages zoph depends on:
ii  apache2                    2.0.54-5      next generation, scalable, extenda
ii  apache2-mpm-prefork [apach 2.0.54-5      traditional model for Apache2
ii  imagemagick                6:6.2.4.5-0.2 Image manipulation programs
ii  jhead                      2.44-1        manipulate the non-image part of E
ii  libdbd-mysql-perl          3.0002-1      A Perl5 database interface to the 
ii  libdbi-perl                1.48-2        Perl5 database interface by Tim Bu
ii  libimage-size-perl         2.992-2       determine the size of images in se
ii  perl                       5.8.7-7       Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  php4                       4:4.4.0-4     server-side, HTML-embedded scripti
ii  php4-gd                    4:4.4.0-4     GD module for php4
ii  php4-mysql                 4:4.4.0-4     MySQL module for php4
ii  unzip                      5.52-3        De-archiver for .zip files
ii  wwwconfig-common           0.0.44        Debian web auto configuration

zoph recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 339843-done) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Jan 2006 00:22:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 23 16:22:39 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pima.hostsharing.net ([212.42.230.40])
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1F1BxG-0001AB-QP
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:22:39 -0800
Received: from scratchy.software-manufaktur.de (p54A0523F.dip.t-dialin.net 
[84.160.82.63])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168/168 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39F39B05DE32
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:22:37 +0100 (CET)
Received: by scratchy.software-manufaktur.de (Postfix, from userid 1002)
        id D82AB2FE93; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:22:34 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fram.software-manufaktur.de (fram.software-manufaktur.de 
[192.168.168.1])
        by scratchy.software-manufaktur.de (Postfix) with SMTP id E39ED2FE8F
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:22:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: by fram.software-manufaktur.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 24 
Jan 2006 01:22:26 +0100
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 01:22:26 +0100
From: Edelhard Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: zoph: New upstream version 0.4 available
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
        protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02


--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: zoph
Version: 0.4-3

bye

Uploaded to unstable

--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD1XNBlByGkm8iLx8RAsdsAKCeoE6/fEFJOG9jlyeLJlet2RNQ4gCfcxi9
2kJVZqhnswMxZuQy9XhLBmY=
=X8Uu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS--


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to