Your message dated Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:43 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#349920: gpcl: FTBFS on amd64
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jan 2006 21:22:21 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 25 13:22:21 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 85-18-136-103.fastres.net ([85.18.136.103] helo=sixtyfour)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F1s5s-0006CD-QM
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 13:22:21 -0800
Received: by sixtyfour (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id BB8E28E62C; Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:21:49 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: gpcl: FTBFS on amd64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.18
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:21:49 +0100
X-Debbugs-Cc: [email protected]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: gpcl
Version: 2.31-4
Severity: important
Justification: fails to build from source
Hi,
during configure I get:
[...]
checking whether gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
checking host system type... Invalid configuration
`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized
checking build system type... Invalid configuration
`x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu': machine `x86_64-unknown' not recognized
checking for ranlib... (cached) ranlib
[...]
loading cache ./config.cache within ltconfig
ltconfig: you must specify a host type if you use `--no-verify'
Try `ltconfig --help' for more information.
configure: error: libtool configure failed
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
is this package not for amd64? If so, can you please add it to
Packages-arch-specific? Otherwise, would it be possible to fix it?
It actually prevents octave-gpc from building.
Thanks,
Roberto
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL
set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 349920-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2006 15:54:46 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jan 26 07:54:45 2006
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kom.mpisoc.mpg.de ([192.129.1.23] helo=kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1F29SP-0008Mk-JH
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 07:54:45 -0800
Received: from amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de ([10.1.1.2])
by kom.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtps (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
(Exim 4.50)
id 1F29SN-0001aB-TO; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:43 +0100
Received: from [10.80.1.253] (helo=laboiss2)
by amalie.intra.mpipf-muenchen.mpg.de with esmtp (Exim 4.05)
id 1F29SO-0004Fw-00; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:44 +0100
Received: from rafael by laboiss2 with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1F29SN-0005fP-00; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:43 +0100
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:54:43 +0100
From: Rafael Laboissiere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#349920: gpcl: FTBFS on amd64
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
* Roberto Pariset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-01-26 12:38]:
> Compiling -5 here produces:
> [...]
> checking for Octave version... ./configure: line 3229:
> /usr/bin/octave2.1: No such file or directory
> configure: error: version of octave must be 2.1.57 or later
> make: *** [build-stamp] Error 1
>
> $ ls /usr/bin/octave*
> /usr/bin/octave /usr/bin/octave-bug
> /usr/bin/octave-config /usr/bin/octave-depends
> /usr/bin/octave-2.1.72 /usr/bin/octave-bug-2.1.72
> /usr/bin/octave-config-2.1.72 /usr/bin/octave-depends-2.1.72
>
> Adding a symlink makes it compile fine. And I am able to install
> octave-gpc, finally.
A new version of octave-gpc (0.1.6-1) has been uploaded that should fix
this problem.
I am closing this bug report, because you apparently suceeded building the
gpcl package on your amd64 system. Feel free to open it again if it is
not the case.
--
Rafael
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
