Your message dated Wed, 5 Apr 2006 22:36:06 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line minor inconsistency in handling pathnames
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: nfs-kernel-server
Version: 1.0-2woody1
On my client I have
nfs_svr_name:dir /mount_point nfs noauto,rsize=8192,rsize=8192 0 0
which has worked with the user space servers but the kernel server
needs
nfs_svr_name:/dir /mount_point nfs noauto,rsize=8192,rsize=8192 0 0
^
|
|
I have no idea which version is correct.
Chip, thanks for the software.
Be well,
Rob
--
rir Live the dream.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 10:37:41AM -0400, R Ransbottom wrote:
> On my client I have
>
> nfs_svr_name:dir /mount_point nfs noauto,rsize=8192,rsize=8192 0 0
>
> which has worked with the user space servers but the kernel server
> needs
>
> nfs_svr_name:/dir /mount_point nfs noauto,rsize=8192,rsize=8192 0 0
>
> ^
> |
> |
>
>
> I have no idea which version is correct.
Both are actually right, in a sense. According to RFC1813, "The names in the
group list are implementation-specific and cannot be directly interpreted by
clients" (thanks to #debian-devel :-) ). Anyhow, as nfs-user-server is rather
stone dead these days, I can't really think of this as a bug in
nfs-kernel-server, so I'm closing. :-)
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--- End Message ---
