Your message dated Wed, 19 Dec 2018 23:40:36 +0000
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#399151: why not nice bcron-start?
has caused the Debian Bug report #399151,
regarding why not nice bcron-start?
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
399151: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=399151
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: bcron
Version: 0.09-4
Severity: normal

Why not add "-n 20" to the bcron-start run script?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18.1-b1
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

Versions of packages bcron depends on:
ii  libc6                         2.3.6-15   GNU C Library: Shared libraries

Versions of packages bcron recommends:
ii  bcron-run                     0.09-4     Bruce's cron system
ii  qmail [mail-transport-agent]  1.03-38    Secure, reliable, efficient, simpl
ii  runit                         1.7.0-1    a UNIX init scheme with service su
ii  ucspi-unix                    0.36-3     UNIX-domain socket client-server c

-- no debconf information


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
control: tags -1 +wontfix

[2006-11-20 15:37] Gerrit Pape <[email protected]>
> On Sat, Nov 18, 2006 at 10:31:23AM +0530, [email protected] wrote:
> > Why not add "-n 20" to the bcron-start run script?
> 
> Why add "-n 20" to the bcron-start run script?  And, more importantly,
> why should that be the default?  You can customize your bcron run
> scripts to your needs, user changes will be preserved.

I agree with previous maintainer. I do not think that bcron, unlike
other implementations of cron, need to get nice adjusted in *default*
configuration.

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to