Your message dated Wed, 27 May 2020 19:16:27 +0000 with message-id <[email protected]> and subject line Bug#916837: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #904446, regarding clang-6.0: fails to link a sanitized binary with gold to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected] immediately.) -- 904446: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=904446 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: clang-6.0 Version: 1:6.0.1-2 Severity: important Dear Maintainer, First, I'm not really sure clang is at fault here since this issue requires a specific combination involving the clang++ compiler, the gold linker and the sanitizers options. Basically, with a specific combination of these tools the link step produces a warning, which may result in a link error if '-Wl,--fatal-warnings' is used. $ cat main.cpp int main(){ return 0; } $ /usr/bin/clang++-6.0 -o main.o -c main.cpp -fsanitize=address $ /usr/bin/clang++-6.0 -o main main.o -fsanitize=address -fuse-ld=gold /usr/bin/ld.gold: warning: discarding version information for __libc_stack_end@GLIBC_2.2.5, defined in unused shared library /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (linked with --as-needed) * Using clang-6.0 (as a C compiler) or clang++-7 (1:7~svn331965-1) does not solve the issue * Using g++-8 instead of clang++-6.0 works fine * Using '-fuse-ld=bfd', '-fuse-ld=lld' or no flags (bfd default) works fine * Using another ('undefined', 'thread' or 'memory') sanitizer is also broken while no sanitizers works fine Sylvain -- System Information: Debian Release: buster/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (800, 'stable-updates'), (800, 'stable'), (700, 'unstable'), (90, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 4.16.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE= (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages clang-6.0 depends on: ii binutils 2.31.1-1 ii libc6 2.27-5 ii libc6-dev 2.27-5 ii libclang-common-6.0-dev 1:6.0.1-2 ii libclang1-6.0 1:6.0.1-2 ii libgcc-7-dev 7.3.0-25 ii libgcc1 1:8.1.0-10 ii libjsoncpp1 1.7.4-3 ii libllvm6.0 1:6.0.1-2 ii libobjc-7-dev 7.3.0-25 ii libstdc++-7-dev 7.3.0-25 ii libstdc++6 8.1.0-10 Versions of packages clang-6.0 recommends: ii libomp-dev 6.0.1-1 ii llvm-6.0-dev 1:6.0.1-2 ii python 2.7.15-3 Versions of packages clang-6.0 suggests: pn clang-6.0-doc <none> pn gnustep <none> pn gnustep-devel <none> -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 1:6.0.1-14.1+rm Dear submitter, as the package llvm-toolchain-6.0 has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/916837 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. Please note that the changes have been done on the master archive and will not propagate to any mirrors until the next dinstall run at the earliest. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [email protected]. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
