Your message dated Sun, 21 Jun 2020 13:54:34 +0200
with message-id <20200621115434.GX19111@sarastro>
and subject line mutt: 'killing' threads
has caused the Debian Bug report #153887,
regarding mutt: 'killing' threads
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
153887: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=153887
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mutt
Version: 1.4.0-2
Severity: wishlist
It would be nice if mutt had the ability to kill threads. This would be
a feature similar to that of news readers. Currently we have ctrl-r
which marks an entire thread as read. The kill threads feature should
work something like this:
-mark thread as read (same as ctrl-r)
-any future messages that fall under this thread should also be marked
as read
Many times on various mailing lists, I find myself completely
uninterested in certain message threads, but have no way of avoiding new
messages that come in, other than hitting ctrl-r over and over and over
again...
I think many others would find such a feature useful as well.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux pyre.virge.net 2.4.19-pre10 #1 Thu Jun 6 20:57:36 EDT 2002 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8
Versions of packages mutt depends on:
ii libc6 2.2.5-12 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libncurses5 5.2.20020112a-8 Shared libraries for terminal hand
ii libsasl7 1.5.27-3.3 Authentication abstraction library
ii postfix [mail-transport- 1.1.11-2 A high-performance mail transport
-- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Control: tag -1 +wontfix
18 years later this feature is still not available, so there is no value in
keeping this bug open.
--- End Message ---