Your message dated Sat, 5 Sep 2026 09:41:20 +0300
with message-id
<CAPZXPQcTv6+cAQ+LQD_8j8HQpruVRbqo-e0tkTqB+=ojxsh...@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: openntpd: man pages: bad pathnames for ntpd.drift and
ntpd.sock
has caused the Debian Bug report #1135029,
regarding openntpd: man pages: bad pathnames for ntpd.drift and ntpd.sock
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
1135029: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1135029
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: openntpd
Version: 1:6.8p1-3
Severity: minor
The ntpd(8) man page has two occurrences of "/var/lib/ntpd.drift"
and one occurrence of "/run/ntpd.sock". The ntpctl(8) man page also
has one occurrence of "/run/ntpd.sock".
These pathnames are incorrect in Debian. The correct ones are
/var/lib/openntpd/db/ntpd.drift
/var/lib/openntpd/run/ntpd.sock
I'm actually wondering whether the second one (for both the actual
pathname and the reference in the man pages) should be changed to
/run/openntpd/ntpd.sock, though.
I suppose that these pathnames are due to
--localstatedir=/var/lib/openntpd
in the debian/rules file, and that upstream should take care of
the --localstatedir config when installing the man pages. However,
I can see debian/patches/02-debianize-man-pages.patch, which
changes the pathnames in an incorrect way.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: forky/sid
APT prefers unstable-debug
APT policy: (500, 'unstable-debug'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500,
'stable-security'), (500, 'stable-debug'), (500, 'proposed-updates-debug'),
(500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.19.13+deb14-amd64 (SMP w/16 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC
Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages openntpd depends on:
ii libc6 2.42-15
ii netbase 6.5
ii systemd [systemd-sysusers] 260.1-1
openntpd recommends no packages.
Versions of packages openntpd suggests:
ii apparmor 4.1.7-2
-- no debconf information
--
Vincent Lefèvre <[email protected]> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Pascaline project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Mon, 27 Apr 2026 03:20:03 +0200 Vincent Lefevre <[email protected]> wrote:
> Package: openntpd
> Version: 1:6.8p1-3
> Severity: minor
>
> The ntpd(8) man page has two occurrences of "/var/lib/ntpd.drift"
> and one occurrence of "/run/ntpd.sock". The ntpctl(8) man page also
> has one occurrence of "/run/ntpd.sock".
>
> These pathnames are incorrect in Debian. The correct ones are
>
> /var/lib/openntpd/db/ntpd.drift
> /var/lib/openntpd/run/ntpd.sock
Those hard-coded paths were fixed upstream in 7.9p1, which has been in
Testing for a while. Closing.
Martin-Éric
--- End Message ---