Your message dated Fri, 13 Oct 2006 17:26:59 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#392862: 3.30's changelog used an non existent bug number
for the EHLO bug.
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.30
Severity: minor
3.30 closed #3226523 (EHLO), which doesn't exist with this number.
While at it, wouldn't it be better to reassign the bug to the package with
the offending documentation?
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 10/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Package: reportbug
Version: 3.30
Severity: minor
3.30 closed #3226523 (EHLO), which doesn't exist with this number.
Indeed. You'll note that there is no such bug number, and this was
rectified by closing the report manually.
While at it, wouldn't it be better to reassign the bug to the package with
the offending documentation?
Not really, although I might eventually get bored enough to report it
directly upstream.
I'm not even sure why this discussion needs to be a separate bug in
the BTS, so I'm closing it. Toodles!
Chris
--
Chris Lawrence - http://blog.lordsutch.com/
--- End Message ---
