Your message dated Wed, 15 Nov 2006 04:47:14 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#398495: fixed in dpatch 2.0.21
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--- Begin Message ---
Package: dpatch
Version: 2.0.20
Severity: important
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I've noticed, that dpatch-edit-patch currently sets the file permissions
for patch to 0711 after a run. I made a quick search through the
changelog and did not find an announcement of this behaviour. IMHO file
permissions of 0755 should be preferred. Could you check this?
I initially set this bug to important, because of the IMO wrong file
permissions.
Regards, Daniel
- -- System Information:
Debian Release: 4.0
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (850, 'unstable'), (700, 'testing'), (550, 'stable'), (110,
'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.17.09060920
Locale: LANG=de_DE, LC_CTYPE=de_DE (charmap=ISO-8859-1)
dpatch depends on no packages.
Versions of packages dpatch recommends:
ii dpkg-dev 1.13.24 package building tools for Debian
ii fakeroot 1.5.10 Gives a fake root environment
ii patchutils 0.2.31-3 Utilities to work with patches
- -- no debconf information
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFWUlhm0bx+wiPa4wRAgu/AJ4mFkwy6cM5z8CDcEMiX2ekUvW7pgCgoM1o
kueoKdCUGw9CVJSF5pUUDFE=
=pw2i
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: dpatch
Source-Version: 2.0.21
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
dpatch, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
dpatch_2.0.21.dsc
to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.21.dsc
dpatch_2.0.21.tar.gz
to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.21.tar.gz
dpatch_2.0.21_all.deb
to pool/main/d/dpatch/dpatch_2.0.21_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated dpatch package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2006 21:31:35 +0900
Source: dpatch
Binary: dpatch
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.0.21
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Dpatch Maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Junichi Uekawa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
dpatch - patch maintenance system for Debian source packages
Closes: 398452 398495
Changes:
dpatch (2.0.21) unstable; urgency=low
.
* Bug fix: "dpatch: wrong example in manpage", thanks to Loic Le Guyader
(Closes: #398452).
The sample file was already fixed, but the manpage had the wrong version.
* Bug fix: "Make dpatch-edit-patch updated patch to have a permission
from umask, not 711", thanks to Daniel Leidert (Closes: #398495).
Files:
6b62b3c6e2bcebd17946c3076fd169a3 655 devel optional dpatch_2.0.21.dsc
45b973ecd19a38206a3f2e463a713b87 85767 devel optional dpatch_2.0.21.tar.gz
088ac41117850e11c23dab153be50a9e 83540 devel optional dpatch_2.0.21_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFFWwpw2Dd9TugeVcERAqIvAJ9T4AdnM8t5lS857TFyNmP8uYgyxACeMTaw
daMgfEhR+2gnfFSL19YStUk=
=eKXq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
