On Mon, 26 Mar 2012 17:35:47 -0400 Joey Hess <[email protected]> wrote:
> Antonio Ospite wrote: > > A patch is on its way, I am not attaching it here so I can add the > > "Closes" tag in it and let you commit it with less burden; is that OK, or > > next time do you prefer to amend the commit to add the "Closes" tag > > yourself? > > This is a nice thing to do, but really only worth doing if you also > update debian/changelog. :) > Ah, sorry, I saw the Closes tag in commit messages and assumed you were using git-dch to update debian/changelog, I have to admit I didn't look at the changelog to confirm that. > I remember a past proposal to allow submitters to reserve bug numbers, > which could then be used to send bug reports with a number known in > advance. Not sure what happened to that idea, perhaps it was too complex > or just never got worked on. > Sounds kinda useful but troublesome indeed; and now I am curios about the current situation: do all debian bug numbers correspond to actual reports, or are there any "holes" in the sequence of debian bug numbers? Thanks, Antonio -- Antonio Ospite http://ao2.it A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
pgpdWYogxubPS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
