On 27.04.2012 10:05, Norbert Preining wrote:
On Fr, 27 Apr 2012, Atsuhito Kohda wrote:
> What do you think? Should I upload to unstable now or should
> I wait until the testing transition is over once?
I'll take a look afterwards. Thanks for your work!
But please test them, esp with respect to upgrades. When I am back
(Kamikochi climbing Maehokadake, then Sadogashima) I will build new
packages and upload them.
> debian-release people? Advise?
I'd like to know an advice too.
Too late, I am leaving soon. Will have to wait after Golden Week.
My answer would have been the same in any case - if texfam is obsolete
and relatively unused then I'd prefer to look at getting the testing
transition out of the way sooner rather than later; that also means
there's no rush to get texfam updated just to get things transitioned.
The dvi2{dvi,ps} NMUs will hit the archive over the next couple of
days, so I'd propose that we look at transitioning texlive-* and the
libkpathsea reverse-dependencies early next week, removing texfam from
testing and breaking it in unstable in the process - texlive people,
does that sound okay?
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org