Package: tumgreyspf Version: 1.35-7 Severity: wishlist Hi!
In tumgreyspf.conf we have: ===== # Path to the program used for SPF checking. This can either be the # perl version available from http://www.openspf.com/ or the # "spfquery-static" program built from libspf2, also available from # http://www.openspf.com/ spfqueryPath = '/usr/bin/spfquery' ===== And in tumgreyspf package we have a depends only on spfquery (thus making it impossible to remove spfquery if we install spf-tools-perl, for example). In Debian we have 3 packages that provide /usr/bin/spfquery (via alternatives): spf-tools-perl (priority 100) spf-tools-python (priority 75) spfquery (priority 25) Shouldn't tumgreyspf have its depends updated to include the other two alternatives? Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- System Information: Debian Release: wheezy/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=pt_BR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=pt_BR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
