Hi Thomas! On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:27 PM, Thomas Goirand <[email protected]> wrote: > On 05/22/2012 04:39 AM, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: >> Shouldn't tumgreyspf have its depends updated to include the other two >> alternatives? > > Have you even tried to run tumgreyspf with these? If you tell me that > you've tested it and that it works, then I'm fine updating the > dependencies. Otherwise, I'm sorry, but I have very little time to test > this (I hope you understand).
I am using spf-tools-perl on a production server and it works without any kind of problem. Tested spf-tools-python on the same server, and things work as expected too. Thank you! Best regards, Nelson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
