-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 tags 6594796 + fixed-upstream thanks
On 2012-05-22 17:57, Tomek Mrugalski wrote: > On 12-05-22 18:23, Martin Bagge / brother wrote: >> any hunch about when this might be updated? using the old package >> is a workaround and so on but I would prefer to have a update... > Already happened many months ago. See 0.8.2 release. It is just not > packaged in Debian yet. I was thinking about the debian package indeed. Sorry if that was a bit unclear =) > There are two guys who are working (well, kind of) on packaging > 0.8.2: Bartosz Fenski and Michal Zubryk (cc:). Unfortunately, they > are busy and they probably could use some help. time is always a problem indeed. this bug probably should be considered RC soon as the package is not usable in this state. severity grave? > Also, when someone does an update, please remove myself from the > maintainers list. I barely have time for upstream maintenance, much > less for distro-specific things. thanks for your work and support. sorry to ping the wrong people. - -- brother http://sis.bthstudent.se -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJPu7zlAAoJEJbdSEaj0jV7jH4H/i7Zdh/Sp6ID3QxX5ps90reJ tqtbC6ge8JSQt/vqosx2I8WzkhciGZY9Ln2i1t0onhtQhjkRY4yhPWv8IUojJ4TT gbHw6bNqz/Y+967x/xHrcmYGyE++LhG1CaK0qkr82zOWilCbr1k8v+rjoMynDSB7 4xmLzNPDr+d2Ea9K2G21bfkB0d5FyengobaC/HDKV/OCPkkPSDwJJpnFB4Dny2AG r4FY4dl1hfUa5OZXGyD0yFb/tK/1ijgcZDiLcyQ+kKaCNGxqD0wGIsjO8U4yZ8PH za6fhm7PioQWLy08Gk7yNPvhxP/kCgmtj2UYh20DUZH2FBMXnu7EB4w17xiy1YE= =A+pS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
