Hi, On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Harshula <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 10:43 +1000, Harshula wrote: >> On Thu, 2012-05-03 at 01:15 +0800, Aron Xu wrote: >> > @Harshula, >> > Several of the buggiest SCIM components (scim-python, scim-bridge) has >> > been removed from archive, and I've requested removal of scim-pinyin, >> > scim-uim and scim-hangul just now. I think it's time to orphan >> > scim-m17n if you plan to. >> >> Let's tie the removal of scim-m17n with the removal of scim. So when >> scim is removed, we'll remove scim-m17n too. > > Update: I've updated the package and added the "IME Packaging Team" as > the maintainer and Osamu and I as Uploaders. >
Thanks! > I don't use SCIM anymore. How do you test SCIM these days? I don't seem > to be able to activate it. > For me I haven't tried the latest SCIM yet because of lacking time, but I do general tests like lintian and other things that don't need to actually run it. It was a bad idea to give the maintainer DMUA as he has uploaded at least two versions of scim with lintian E: tag and renders the package not useable (#675224 and #675688). They are mostly caused by struggling to enable Multi-Arch. I've spotted more issues in the package but don't have time to deal with it this week. More reports and/or NMU will flow into bts/archive next week. -- Regards, Aron Xu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
