2012/6/30 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>: > On 30.06.2012 00:35, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: >> 2012/6/30 Michael Biebl <bi...@debian.org>: >>> On 30.06.2012 00:18, Gonéri Le Bouder wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 10:49:29AM +0000, Roger Leigh wrote: >>>>> On Tue, Oct 04, 2011 at 11:48:06PM +0200, bi...@debian.org wrote: >> >>> /dev/.udev/db has been deprecated a long time ago. >>> If fusioninventory-agent does not actually need that information, why >>> keep the code? >> The agent can still run on older system. > > That doesn't explain my question, does it? > > If fusioninventory-agent needs that information, it should be updated to > use /run/udev > If it doesn't need that information, it should drop the relevant code.
FusionInventory will try different methods to get the list of the block devices, so no, it won't hurt. The patch was imported some years ago to get manufacturer/serial/module for the given device. http://gitorious.org/fusioninventory/agent/commit/0aecefcf99a09f826c078ebf92b2b0370ce47a6d Best regards, -- Gonéri Le Bouder -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-dist-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
